Why? I don’t know, maybe someone here will like it.

  • DudeWithaTwist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Task manager is one of the few Windows apps that works really well. Glad to see the design making it’s way to Linux.

  • FluffyPotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh wow, this is really nice. I was using System Monitoring Center but this is so much nicer. My only complaint is no CPU temperature display but that’s not a huge loss.

    Windows had 2 pieces of software that didn’t have a better alternative in Linux, now I just gotta find something like Notepad++ and I’m good.

  • netvor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looks good. Anyone knows if there are .deb’s somewhere?

    TBH, I’m not likely to use flatpak untill I absolutely have to, and with $meta+= exec htop in my .i3/config I’m not exactly the primary audience.

    (By the way, that’s nothing against the author’s decision to go “flatpak first”, I fully support whatever choice they make as long as the project is F/LOSS. I don’t have the resources to help so I’m happy to wait until the project grows enough until the deb appears…)

  • oldfart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine launching a flatpak when your computer is already overloaded 💀

  • gabriele97@lemmy.g97.topOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Guys do you have a memory leak? When it is open, it consumes around 200 MB of RAM. After a while it reaches 800 MB

    • mst@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How long is “a while”? I’ve had it open for around 30 minutes now and I’m not seeing what you’re describing. Around the 15 minute mark I also tried clicking through various tabs, performing some actions, etc. and memory usage is still staying steady at 247MiB.

        • mst@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That is a very good question. Short answer: I don’t know as I am not familiar with the project.

          I have had a brief look at the issue tracker and it doesn’t seem to be mentioned on there. Perhaps I will raise an issue later when I am at my computer (or if anyone else beats me to it then please feel free).

    • aski3252@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well it’s not bad in theory, it just runs like ass… This version already runs 10 times faster than the real thing, sometimes I wonder what the hell is going on over at Microsoft.

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thing is when your system is dying and nothing is responding, you can almost always trust task manager to respond because of its privileges, simplicity and the fact it’s built into the OS rather than using APIs, even if explorer.exe crashes.

        Given there’s no “ctrl-alt-f2: Imma go fix this mess” on Windows, having at least something you can rely on to not die is super valuable even if it is bad.

        I’m not saying this tool isn’t better for system monitoring (but I would like to see something like KSysGuard), just that Microsoft absolutely shouldn’t touch task manager to fix whatever’s wrong with it’s resource usage monitoring functionality to avoid breaking something else in it