JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agodotnet developerprogramming.devexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up117arrow-down10
arrow-up117arrow-down1external-linkdotnet developerprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareOneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoSorry, what’s .Net again? The runtime? You mean .Net, or .Net Core, or .Net Framework? Oh, you mean a web framework in .Net. Was that Asp.Net or AspNetcore? Remind me why we let the “Can’t call it Windows 9” company design our enterprise language?
minus-squareXTornado@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years ago.net core is not a thing anymore in case somebody it’s not aware, now is just .net. (unless you use really old version of course).
minus-squareTrailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years ago Can’t call it Windows 9 But that actually made sense! They care about backwards compatibility. For those not in the know: some legacy software checked if the OS name began with “Windows 9” to differentiate between 95 and future versions.
minus-squarecoloredgrayscale@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoMay I introduce you to Usb 3.x renaming? 3.0, 3.1Gen1, 3.2Gen1, 3.2Gen1x1 are the 5Gbps version. 3.1Gen2, 3.2Gen2, 3.2Gen1x2, 3.2Gen2x1 are the 10Gbps version.
minus-squareneutron@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoAre those USB naming schemes, or edgy usernames from 2000s like xXx_31Gen3x1HardCore_xXx?
Sorry, what’s .Net again?
The runtime? You mean .Net, or .Net Core, or .Net Framework? Oh, you mean a web framework in .Net. Was that Asp.Net or AspNetcore?
Remind me why we let the “Can’t call it Windows 9” company design our enterprise language?
.net core is not a thing anymore in case somebody it’s not aware, now is just .net. (unless you use really old version of course).
But that actually made sense! They care about backwards compatibility.
For those not in the know: some legacy software checked if the OS name began with “Windows 9” to differentiate between 95 and future versions.
I scream silently everytime.
May I introduce you to Usb 3.x renaming?
3.0, 3.1Gen1, 3.2Gen1, 3.2Gen1x1 are the 5Gbps version.
3.1Gen2, 3.2Gen2, 3.2Gen1x2, 3.2Gen2x1 are the 10Gbps version.
Are those USB naming schemes, or edgy usernames from 2000s like
xXx_31Gen3x1HardCore_xXx?