You’re the one saying we shouldn’t be cross comparing different numbers with different meanings… While literally comparing different numbers with different meanings to support your point

…Who do you think gangs are recruiting? You know literally nothing about this topic, huh?

Yeah we’re clearly talking about different things here. This dataset does not seem to differentiate between shootings that occurred between specific individuals with a grievance, while technically on school grounds, but likely both outside, and outside of normal school hours, likely gang and drug related, and individuals who choose to go Rambo on nonspecific or at least a large group of people within the school, during normal hours. Which are very different scenarios with very different motivations and potential remedies.

How will you address the hit to morale?

“By making it worse!”

About 4 months before I have to sell any assets. Then about 144 months, not including future growth of those assets before they’re sold. But then I’m broke at nearly 50.

Buy into a broad market tracking ETF (something that tracks s&P 500 or 1000 or similar). That way you’re not betting on individual companies, your betting on the collective largest companies in the world doing well. Over a long period of time, which for over a century has averaged ~7% inflation adjusted return yearly.

I apparently have the uncanny ability of being able to sense when I am drowsy. Call up the X-Men

Not school/mass shootings, no.

Shootings in general, yes.

Making him a martyr would be a bad consequence.

Once again failing to hold a president accountable for crimes against the country only keeps that avenue wide open for the future.

There’s two

But maybe we should take away the reasons that make people think divinity supports their actions, instead of them just being shitty people making shitty decisions.

The rapid increase in school shootings coinsided with the expiration of the assault weapons ban.

So, no. They really weren’t

Well this didn’t happen.

We need a better voting system that can support more than two parties, first

I already answered this, you chose to ignore it. I will not repeat, as you’re not arguing in good faith.

Blatantly, no. Learn to read. Holy shit

No. Go away newsom. You can be an attack dog or lightning rod. You’d be a shit president.

Who is cooking outdoors AFTER IT IS DARK ENOUGH FOR FIREWORKS?

Can’t filibuster a budget reconciliation bill. How many times do we have to go through this before people understand that?

ICE also keep getting caught on camera lying about being threatened before they start beating some innocent

The obscene concentration of wealth is bad for the stability of the country. The existence of billionaires is a policy failure. And there’s no world where they exist without them being able to influence politicians, rules against it or not. You can’t just exclude one of the biggest drawbacks of their existence from criticism