Feeeeeeeeeemales?! UGH!!!

oh god, it’s just a saying, chillax

it’s just eye contact. look open and neutral. if people notice you paying attention to them, they’ll engage more likely than if you have your head down covered in hood with headphones on

I hearby petition an amendment for an expansion of the child protective laws to widen the definition of abuse, neglect, and reckless abandonment of children to include:

“letting children browse without ad blockers”

I mean that’s the point of research: to demonstrate real world problems and put it in more concrete terms so we can respond more effectively

lmao wait what holy shit is that line originally from Arthur??? that sounds exactly like something the bunny dude would say

Check the story! They knew they were going to die. That was the point. He told them. He told them exactly what was up and they consented. Their minds were so twisted by his lies that they couldn’t imagine any other life. That’s what drinking the koolaid means: you subscribe to a belief wholeheartedly, even a crazy one, to the point where youd rather die than question it.

you need to be careful with your assumptions. Just because it looks like facts can connect and lead to natural conclusions does not mean they do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid

it was a tool of mass suicide not a drug to get high on lol

I’m sorry but this is fucking stupid. WHO is calling WHAT immoral? Someone babbling on recycling, who the fuck cares about recycling?

Poorest people are 100% capable of making choices that align with their personal values as anyone else. This is such a fucking Christian thread. What, do you think morals come from the Bible? what a joke

it was a pun

should have tried a more violent response

Fair question! I’m not sure if there are any other industry figures holding major positions in the federal government but that would definitely be worth discussing if it isn’t just Elon

of course you didnt. that’s why the misunderstanding comes in. I just wonder what you’re implying with that comment… the interpretation i gave above is the first thing that comes to mind. like, so what if the author didn’t consider that, what changes?

id be happy to hear a clarification!

So you’re saying that a corrupt man in power uses that power to benefit himself at the expense of the public, but it’s not corruption, because additional parties also happen to benefit?

i must be misunderstanding

2 weeks. canvassing for Working Families Party in Brooklyn

it highlights the fact that these LLMs refuse to say “I don’t know”, which essentially means we cannot rely on them for any factual reporting.

still way better than the other one

I can’t

fyi discord has already been enshitifying for at least 5 years now

Excuse me, if you actually understand the path and believe the point is being “nice”, then why the fuck are you talking to me like that? And if you don’t understand the path, then again, why the fuck are you talking to me like that?

The eightfold path concerns “right” or “wise” or “virtuous” action… but what do those have to do with being “nice”?? Haven’t you heard that light and dark create one another?