• 0 Posts
  • 270 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyztoShowerthoughts@lemmy.worldGolden Rule is flawed
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Since knowledge is woefully inadequate, this would necessarily boil down to “treat others as you assume they treat others,” which is exactly the moral standard already followed by trigger-happy cops, ICE agents, MAGAs and bigots in general.

    Is that really the best you can do?

    As far as the Golden Rule goes, it’s immensely improved by framing it negatively - do not do unto others as you would not have done unto you.










  • Of course he can, though it"s exceedingly unlikely that he will be, since it’s a process that would require integrity, courage and determination, all of which are virtually non-existent qualities in Washington today.

    Which is unfortunate too, since as I have cause to point out daily, the man is quite obviously a deranged lunatic.

    I really don’t think he’s ever been particularly attached to reality, but the combination of losing the 2020 election and stewing and lying for four years then lying his way to winning the 2024 election appears to have completely broken his mind. And the upshot of that is that the world in which he now lives and makes important decisions is not the real one - it’s entirely a product of his own warped perceptions, as filtered through an emotionally stunted mind that’s slaved to the task of protecting his grotesquely bloated and fragile ego and has completely lost any ability it might once have had to distinguish between reality and delusion.











  • It’s a bit late in the game for that isn’t it?

    I mean - she’s right, but the SC has already cast aside law, precedent and the Constitution at this point, and is ruling almost entirely based on opinion. Or maybe it would be more accurate to say, “preference.”

    In the book, set for publication on 9 September, Barrett asserted her belief that the June 2022 ruling that struck down abortion rights nationally “respected the choice” of Americans.

    Ah… so she’s not just contradicting the plain reality of the current SC, but her own statements.

    Or more precisely, just spewing whatever line of bullshit might serve her current purposes.

    Which is undoubtedly the reason she was nominated in the first place, and the exact thing she was expected to contribute.

    Helluva timeline we’re living in here…