

Headline: says something. (That is obviously not true and just clickbaiting)
Instant disclaimer: the headline is not good, it should be instead “don’t do this other thing”.
Later in the article: how do we avoid doing the thing I told you not to do? By doing what I told you not to do.
The dude may be correct (idk, haven’t bothered reading the rest of the article), but he doesn’t know how to write/communicate. I don’t believe he’s respecting my time. Just tell in the title what you actually want to talk about.







What is this article? There is no author, and it is written as if it were an objective truth when it is clearly subjective.
There is no conclusion, it’s just an introduction paragraph that says “do this, this is good design”, followed by a pro-con analysis, and then the article just ends. Given that it has real drawbacks, you would think it would be more nuanced than “do this, this is good design”.
Furthermore the analysis is not even complete. The only 2 drawbacks mentioned only affecting the developer of the language. And ignoring more obvious drawbacks that would affect the users of the language: