Hildegard (she/her)

Its limited to 2000 households during this 5 week pilot program. You pre-register and only those selected are offered the money. Its doubtful they would pick you if the car you propose using is a non-working project car.

Legal risk. Being federated means mirroring the content locally and that can cause liability for the instance owner. Laws around porn can vary by country and to some being federated could be illegal, or be an unreasonable risk.

I’ve found it it works best exporting to musicxml from finale. Musesccore and most other notation software supports musicxml, and it works recently well as s go-between.

Lilypond. Its music software. Learning it will keep you occupied for at least a week.

Yes

I can still get erections despite having T levels that are too low to measure with a normal blood test. Skill issue.

Control. Unions get a seat at the negotiating table. With a union things have to be done by mutual agreement, and the workers have recourse if things go wrong. Being a manager is much more powerful without a unionized workforce, finance notwithstanding.

They often personally take unionization as an insult or betrayal, so they try and get revenge using the one thing available to them at that stage. With overwhelming support, it’s only a matter of time before the vote passes and they are forced to recognize the union.

This is not uncommon. Managers want to rule over people without restraint even in nonprofits.

There’s a good reason testosterone is a controlled substance and estrogen isn’t.

If they’re bogus, show up to the ICC with a lawyer to argue your case. Coward.

Calling it a license plate reader is a lie to get them installed by municipal governments. They are high resolution AI survellience cameras that track people using any information they can gather. They also record network signals to associate you with any devices you frequently carry.

There are installations of these cameras on footpaths, and other places without car traffic. Flock cameras are not a car related issue.

That is what happened. The accused told the boarder agent the duress pin when asked. The agent entered the pin that initiated the wipe.

Could make a difference at trial, didn’t stop the case prior to the arrest.

You cannot appease nazis or drivers. It does not work.

No one drives because there’s too much traffic.

Their main search has AI in it. They have an alternate non-ai version which they seem to be pushing in marketing.

They’re shoving AI where no one asked for it like every other tech company. However, it seems some small portion of their staff hasn’t drunk the AI coolaid, so they have a non AI search as a little side project.

I hate that governments keep doing pilot programs. Enough research has already been done on the topic. Stop wasting tax dollars on consultants, feasibility studies, and pilot programs. Just block the cars.

The judge seems to disagree with you. Like the judge, I have also read the statutes. Gross negligence, as far as the law is comcermed, is far greater than misreading one traffic signal one time.

The driver, as a presumably ordinary human, made an ordinary human mistake, that anyone could make. North American streets are designed so poorly that a single ordinary mistake results in fatalities.

Even if the court could grant the consequences you’re asking for it would do nothing to make roads safer.

The intersection requires pedestrians to wait, unprotected, in a dangerous location directly at the corner. The designer of the intersection recklessly endangered people to the most serious degree and is being let off scott free.

The vehicle that did the killing was an SUV. SUVs are large and heavy, with high blunt front ends. These are incredibly dangerous in a colission, far more likely to cause fatalities than modern passenger cars with a low nose that scoop under pedestrians in a colission. The car’s designer, manufacturer, and vehicle regulator who allowed this dangerous design onto the streets recklessly endangered people to the most serious degree and are being let off scott free.

This court isn’t even able to try most of those responsible.

Traffic lights encourage drivers to move quickly, and ignore their surroundings. They tell drivers to trust the intersection to be clear if the signal is green. This means that if a prudent and cautious driver makes the single mistake of misreading the light, it risks a high speed colission.

A 4-way stop would have slowed traffic, likely preventing fatalities in this case. Even if the driver missed the stop sign, the cross traffic would be slow enough to not push the SUV into the corner of the intersection. At the same time there wouldn’t be pedestrians in the corner, because 4-way stops allow pedestrians to cross quickly, and doesn’t require them to wait directly next to intersections.

This is an urban road. It was a choice to prioritize traffic speed and car throughput over pedestrian safety. This is the inevitable result.

You clearly weren’t paying attention for the twenty seconds it took to read my comment.

You can literally design roads without lights.