Not what I said. I am saying it should be up to businesses if they want to yield to that. It strikes me as entitled to say granting the money during their leave is the only acceptable way of going about it. But excuse me for seeing that someone asked what I think of paternity leave and not answering how they might’ve wanted.

I would say that, ideally, it should be up to the businesses if they want to uphold that, though that stance should be specified at the beginning.

Turquoise.

Human services.

If they’re fine with it, so am I. I am in no place to get between people.

“Rude” can be so many things that it depends. In your situation, I would’ve removed him. He violated policy. When I work somewhere, it’s my job to protect what I must. Anything else I just treat as expression.

How is everyone today?

Cats would become official heirlooms, passed down between house and family.

The answer you’d be looking for is “both”.

You mean like the psychics, the aura weilders, etc.?

I’d start over in New Zealand but take the same degree.

So the new Avatar series has this in its description: “The newest avatar will have to deal with both humans and spirits hunting her down in a world where being the avatar is a mark of shame.”

And I think to myself… hmm… what if those spirits overlapped with Pokémon? Unknown creatures living among humans? That’s literally Pokémon. All the creatures in Avatar remind me of Pokémon.

It’s not like many of us haven’t thought of this for a while, but with the setting, it’s asking for it. Avatar as a saga is ambitious but still susceptible to crashing. Make that mega crossover.

I’m not sure how joking the other responders are or not as it sounds normal, sounding stoically loose (as in not uptight) albeit in a buffoonish way. You don’t “hear” the pomp in them

It can go both ways I guess, as despite being among Americans for some time, they still describe me as sounding “like genderswapped Jango Fett”. I thought he’d be forgotten by now.

Sounds like you’re talking about me. I guess that’s my cue.

deleted by creator

Tax the practices, not the existence.

You could say that.

I thought you might have been thinking about Transformers One.

If everything I need is in the city, I wouldn’t leave. I would only leave if pushed to.

That there is more to the context than what you see (not to mention it happened years ago with any amends that needed to be made having been made, the kind of thing pictures wouldn’t show) and that the person you initially were responding to who is trying to spread around the claims “about Triagonal” has been a part of an ongoing harassment/stalking/slandering campaign against the people they’re referring to, which is what I was alluding to.

The last two pictures portray things that took place in response to other things. The other person in the first one only got upset because she was recommending something far more NSFW and someone missed a beat when a second thing was suggested which didn’t have any inherently non-platonic-related undertones. Same with the picture after it. Everyone was throwing loose answers out there in response to a joke thread about an art phenomenon, and there was only one pairing not taken up.

The first picture’s vagueness aside, it’s amazing anyone takes someone’s word for plain grey text on a plain white backdrop that portrays something you’d expect to be impossible if the individual doing it is banned from that place for whatever reason they got banned for. It’s the equivalent of accusing someone of writing their own name on a bathroom wall when the accused person has been dead for a month. Is gullibility just the modus operandi for fediverse revolutionaries?