• SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    All jokes aside, things like this are why China is beating us. I am absolutely not a fan of the Chinese government, but the simple fact is they get shit done.

    • rustydomino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It helps that in China you can’t own land. All the land is owned by the government. You only have “use rights” and for a limited time (something like 80 years - I forget the exact number). So when it comes time to build infrastructure the government just tells you to gtfo.

      • rustydomino@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Look to public transit development in Taiwan as an example of how to do it right in a democratic nation. There are still loads of problems but the Taiwanese government can’t just take your land outright. Taipei especially has seen phenomenal growth in its metro development in the last 20 years.

          • mlg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just like how Pakistan administers Jammu & Kashmir and India administers AJK & Gilgit Baltistan, both of which are across the Line of Control in the opposite country’s border lol.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        America is no different. Try not paying your land tax.

        The only difference is that, in America, someone needs to shout “eminent domain!” first and slip you $500 for your house.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        China has stronger property laws than the US, look up stuck nail houses. If the US wants your property, they can eminent domain your shit. In China, developers have literally had to swerve highways around property or build shopping centers around that one person who wont sell

        • jaschen306@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lies. My family had a factory in Wuxi, China. 2 buildings that were dedicated to dormitories. 4 buildings dedicated to manufacturing promotional products.

          We were able to lease the land for 50 years with a 50-year option at the end of the term.

          Around year 5, the government decided to turn the main dirt road into a proper road. They took back 1/4 of the land. They just used our area for staging.

          About a year after the road was made, they decided to expand the road. They took back now 1/2 of the original land and buildings.

          Less than a year after the expansion, they turned the 4 lane road i to a highway. They took the entire land back. My family invested millions of dollars in buildings and infrastructure. We got back pennies on the dollar spent on the investment on compensation.

          My family never fully recovered financially.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Huh, if the government has that power, why don’t they use it for stuck nail houses? I talked to a few people in shenzhen who made significant sums selling land to developers.

            Different type of ownership due to your family purchasing the land vs inheriting it? Different provinces? Did they compell them by indirect means such as threatening to revoke a business liscense or asking suppliers to pressure them?

            • jaschen306@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know. Wuxi is significantly smaller than Shenzhen. I think it was around 2 million people at that time.

              They didn’t give my parents much of an option. When they did finally take the land away, they did offer to relocate us to another location, but at that time, my family was already struggling from the 2nd loss, my parents just ended up closing the business all together.

      • 𝕮𝕬𝕭𝕭𝕬𝕲𝕰@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait until you hear about the UK! I own the freehold to my land, but technically it’s gramted by the crown, so I could in theory at any moment have my home taken from me.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean so does the United States thanks to the 13th amendment but we don’t have anywhere near the same infrastructure to show for it

          • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            American slave labor isn’t used for anything interesting - it’s just letting companies pay less for labor for their own benefit.

              • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                that’s not the slave labour that’s building china, just as prison labour isn’t what’s powering the US

                the actual productive slave labour is done by regular workers who nominally have “freedom”, just that they don’t actually have a choice if they and their family want to live.

                • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  lmao do you think china has an industry of mustache-twirling villains whose job it is to threaten peoples families if they dont work for free? Presumably they work for free to keep their families alive too.

          • gurnu@lemmy.worldBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ever heard of Uyghurs? Or do you just refuse to read the news?

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wrong, the state owns the land but you can own the house, and not just for your 70y BS period.

        There are plenty of articles like of instances where homeowners don’t want to sell for infrastructure like this: https://twistedsifter.com/2012/11/china-builds-highway-around-house/

        I know for a fact here in EU or the US they will indeed " just tells you to gtfo"

        BTW, in China a high 90% of people OWN their house and aren’t rentslaves.
        So there’s that China bad man.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s hard to overstate how much safer and more ethical it is to use eminent domain and fairly compensate someone monetarily for their property than to leave their house in the middle of a highway

          • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s besides the point wether you think it’s better or not, it should be the OWNER’s decision as is the case in China.
            And not what this rustydomino is pulling out of his ass.

            • protist@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              No it’s not besides the point, it’s in direct response to your point. Leaving a house in the middle of the highway is a better outcome for no one

              • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The discussion was about having rights of ownership and on the decision, not anyone’s opinion what is better.
                So you’re completely besides the point even if you can’t admit this obvious fact.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m sure the developers offered “fair compensation”, you need to demand lot before fucking up the highway design is more economical than meeting their offer.

            • protist@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              In the US, the government provides compensation, not developers, and they pay fair market value as determined by local appraisal districts.

              • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The main difference here seems to be that the US can compell property owners to accept what they determine is a fair market rate, but another poster informed me that in some cases the chinese can compell people to sell too.

    • grumpusbumpus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      No just any shit, shit that helps everyday people living in their country.

      I’m just thinking of the major cities in my U.S. state where the public transit map, before and after, looks like Chengdu in 2010. So as unfortunate as the circumstances are in Toronto, they can be even worse.

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the reasons they can build their future so quickly is because they were left in a unique position after WW2 to effectively destroy their past.

      • gurnu@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        And they have slave labor. Oops, I guess that’s something that shouldn’t be said in a post pandering China

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been to urumqi, literally anyone can go there.

          Theres no slave labor, its normal industrial farms. Unless youre suggesting the guys driving the combine harvesters or running the factories are secretly enslaved.

          • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re USian - you have vastly more domestic slaves (I think you call them prisoners in for-profit prisons) than Uyghur population. Maybe you should do something about it.

            If you’re not USian, no rebuttal.

          • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The US hates China, hates muslims but pretend to care about those poor Chinese muslims.
            I wonder why?

        • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only country I know taht has slave labor is the US and their barbaric Gulf states friend.
          But the poor Uyghurs!!! BS propaganda

        • ShouldIHaveFun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not like workers having to do 2 or 3 jobs in the US just to allow their family to survive are really “free workers”. At least slaves in China seem to benefit the country. In the US, the slaves just benefit big corporations and their shareholders.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m curious, tell me more about this (actual question, not being sarcastic)

        • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          China was invaded by Japan before WW2. Look up the Rape of Nanking if you want specifics. Once WW2 ended China had a civil war. The CCP managed to win and Mao Zedong ascended to power. He led the Cultural Revolution which basically eliminated the old ways of China to pave the way, over the bodies of millions of people, for modern China.