• bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    OK so now imagine 4 things you’re doing and they take up the width of one monitor each

    That’s an assumption I [Edit (bad English): contend challenge]. Often when I see people who claim they need n monitors, then they’re wasting screen space like nothing. For instance, giving 2560px to a web browser that effectively uses the 920px in the middle to display text, because reading a line across 17 inches is terrible.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      /shrug You can challenge that assumption, and it might be the case for you, but if you’re a developer, or you’re working in applications like DaVinci Resolve, or you’re comparing multiple spreadsheets, or you’re comparing a spreadsheet with your taxes, or the list goes on and on. For example, here is someone developing a game with Unity https://i.sstatic.net/TrHVR.png and they don’t even have their IDE window up!

      Here’s a really good example 😉 https://www3.nasa.gov/specials/mcc360/

      • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Your first example is exactly what I’m talking about. 2/3 of screen space are wasted and literally show an empty void. And you’re telling me it’s essential to see that?

        I grant you that this might change as development goes on, but as the screenshot stands now, it’s an argument in my favor.

        As for the NASA image: I see that all these indicators may be open, so the user can immediately see when one flashes red. That isn’t so much the case for people who have discord (or task manager, WTF?) open on a full screen. Or a calendar, as I mentioned in another comment.

        Also: Are you a NASA engineer?