The Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women’s Association takes legal action against Kmart to come clean about whether its suppliers are connected to Uyghur forced labour.

“Kmart markets itself as an ethical business, but two of its suppliers have been linked to Xinjiang in China, where the mass internment, repression and forced labour of Uyghur people is rife,” the rights group says in a statement.

This case is the first of its kind in seeking to bring real accountability home to Australian retailers about the risk of Uyghur forced labour in their supply chains.

This is an important step in making Kmart back up its words with actions when it comes to its ethical sourcing claims.

This case also highlights the weaknesses in Australia’s modern slavery laws. It shouldn’t be left to members of the public to compel companies to open their books through legal action where there are suspicions of links to modern slavery.

[…]

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 days ago

      ANKO. We were sad when we saw Anko infiltrate the local Target after Kmart went through a merger with them in 2023.

      We regularly avoid Kmart because the Anko crap filled the store, with very little in the way of brand options for any product type - just several different models of Anko - and then all the various brands disappeared from Target after the merger and were replaced with Anko… a massive loss of consumer choices, all for the benefits of owner, Wesfarmers. Bleh. I don’t think most consumers notice or care?

      • Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        I love ANKO, it’s cheap crap compared to the expensive crap they sold before. All lasts the same time.

    • melbaboutown@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Some Anko items were more expensive like tracksuit pants at $15 and iirc boots could be like $30-40. Still looking back it should have been a bad sign.

      • Salvo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        We used to be able to get $15 trackie dacks in the 90’s.

        I had a rich surfer mate who would bring a few bags of them when we went camping; He would put in a new pair every night when it started to get cold, and then in the morning, would cut them down into a new pair of board shorts.

        However, taking into consideration our ridiculous inflation and COL increases, that would be the equivalent of $60 trackie dacks nowadays.

  • melbaboutown@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    Oh shit. I didn’t think Kmart used sweatshops (and thought price rises were in part due to more ethical practices) but guess I’m naive.

    Guess I’m going back to op shops

    • Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Be careful some places like Savers aren’t op shops but Americans shops who sell donated goods for their own profit.

      Others like Salvos use the money to push Christian hate on society.

    • kudra@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Which are unfortunately full of Kmart fast fashion, often at more expensive prices than Kmart…

      • melbaboutown@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        I know :(

        I prefer to buy items like socks and underwear new as well. I wonder if Cotton On is better for budget basics. The prices aren’t as low but that means nothing about ethics these days