cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoFeel old yet?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1823arrow-down14
arrow-up1819arrow-down1imageFeel old yet?lemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square63fedilink
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agoThey were floppy though? At least 8 inch, and 5.25 inch. 3.5 only on the inside (unless enough force is applied xD).
minus-squarenyan@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·2 days agoThe larger ones were flexible, not floppy—they could be bent without cracking the casing, but wouldn’t just bend under their own weight.
minus-squareleftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoIf you held them by a side and shaked them, they were definitely floppy.
They were floppy though?
At least 8 inch, and 5.25 inch. 3.5 only on the inside (unless enough force is applied xD).
By 3.5" you ofc mean:
/s
The larger ones were flexible, not floppy—they could be bent without cracking the casing, but wouldn’t just bend under their own weight.
If you held them by a side and shaked them, they were definitely floppy.