• Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Rude thing to say about something somebody took the time and made, IMO. Especially considering that there’s literally nothing wrong with the images we’re even talking about. The pictures are just fine.

    This is reminding me of people being critical of artists for using Photoshop.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      You knew, sometimes the most skilled artists can still produce shit, and you’re entitled to not enjoy every piece regardless of its technical quality.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m not talking about the OP image, I’m talking about boardroom driven, focus tested “entertainment products” that have about as much in common with art as “food products” do with nutrition.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      This different between AI and Photoshop is that Photoshop takes time and skill; you need creativity.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure. But this doesn’t look like AI in the first place. It looks more like a Maya render, if anything.