Jay Leno’s star power wasn’t enough to persuade a California legislative committee to pass a measure to allow owners of classic cars like him to be exempted from the state’s rigorous smog-check requirements.
Imagine being rich and famous and this is your political cause. What an effing creep.
Its exactly what they wrote …we have as much land devoted to housing cars as people etc. The inference meaning it is inefficient use of land, and everyone knows urban sprawl is a terrible waste and creates additional costs
They wrote ‘leaving A car in a garage is ENVIRONMENTALLY DEVASTATING’.
Perhaps what they meant and you think you read was, building multi storey car parks is environmentally damaging.
But they didn’t say that.
So like I said, you can spin it whatever way you want, I understand the sentiment but the sentence was stupid.
Goodbye.
Find it because that’s not what I see, seems your are paraphrasing
I mean half of me wants to say fuck off, I don’t have to prove anything to you, but I can’t resist proving you wrong. Sauerkraut is the poster.
Heh. Well, these modern communicatin methods only survive by the discourse created within them. So kudos for participating :) But what you pasted is different than what you said “leaving a car in a garage is environmentally devastating”. They are talking plural and systemic, as you read the first line and past the first sentence. As our world population grows and we run out of habitable space, car storage will start to take a back seat.
When I lived in Ontario in a few cities with lits of developable space people built 2-4 car garages, and shopping places had giant parking lots. Here in BC where livable land is more finite underground parking is common for housing units and stores. But that is still wasted space and effort, compared to European cities that have amazing public transit.
Anyway, I realize I can be pedantic, so I hope you have a good Monday.