In this setting, liberals face a conundrum. How far should they maintain traditional liberal ideals, and how far should they move towards non-liberal, and potentially illiberal, ideologies if these seem more promising for the purposes of social change?

  • cabbage@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Dude, relax.

    The very concept of human rights is a product of liberalism as a political philosophy. You seem to support values championed by liberal philosophers, while also thinking that liberalism is basically satan. Pick a side.

    I’m anti capitalist, I would consider myself a socialist but not a liberalist, but I’m nonetheless at least as influenced by liberal thought as I am by socialist thought. If you can’t square that that’s worrying, but I’ve spent enough time here.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The very concept of human rights is a product of liberalism as a political philosophy.

      No

      You seem to support values championed by liberal philosophers, while also thinking that liberalism is basically satan. Pick a side.

      What an absolutely asinine and reductive interpretation of what I said.

      I’m anti capitalist

      Then you are not a liberal, by definition

      I’m nonetheless at least as influenced by liberal thought as I am by socialist thought.

      Yes, obviously; socialist thought is directly descended from liberal thought, it is impossible to be a socialist without being influenced by liberal thought.

      If you can’t square that that’s worrying, but I’ve spent enough time here.

      What a bad faith little worm comment.