りん〜@sopuli.xyz to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-216 hours agoIsn't brave supposed to be "private"?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1169arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1161arrow-down1imageIsn't brave supposed to be "private"?lemmy.mlりん〜@sopuli.xyz to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-216 hours agomessage-square48fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredajoho@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up9·9 hours agoIt’s a shame this is necessary, to be honest. It’s the same argument with Windows users: “you can just run a debloater and fiddle with the registry to disable tracking”. It shouldn’t be needed in the first place.
minus-squarefunkycarrot@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 hours agoYeah, Zorin did this recently too. They made some good arguments on why Mozilla’s trustworthiness has nosedived these past few years, but awkwardly centered on a ToS change that didn’t really amount to much. They didn’t make a case for why Brave is more trustworthy, though… (and I’m not sure one can)
It’s a shame this is necessary, to be honest. It’s the same argument with Windows users: “you can just run a debloater and fiddle with the registry to disable tracking”. It shouldn’t be needed in the first place.
Yeah, Zorin did this recently too. They made some good arguments on why Mozilla’s trustworthiness has nosedived these past few years, but awkwardly centered on a ToS change that didn’t really amount to much.
They didn’t make a case for why Brave is more trustworthy, though… (and I’m not sure one can)