• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    There was a concept I thought was neat. Imagine around stops you had a parallel set of tracks with cars that would connect to the train and passengers would have X number of minutes to transfer between the parallel trains before they decouple.

    So a ‘fast lane’ train wouldn’t actually stop, it would just couple to another train that does pretty much nothing but transfer passengers to and from the stop.

    Though the reality is that would require a lot of work when the counter argument can be “fly a plane direct instead”

    • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The Nightjet trains from La Spezia (Italy) goes both to Wien and München, as it splits in Villach.
      On the opposite direction, the train from München is coupled with the one from Wien.

      Why is it not done more often? Because coupling trains is a security operation, and it takes time (1h+).
      On top of that, modern trains are a fixed composition that you cannot couple and decouple as you like.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Note this concept was about a hypothetical design and infrastructure. That coupling would be horizontal and occurring while moving and using train designs that didn’t yet exist.

        I said interesting, not necessarily practical. It’s something we might have tried to do if we didn’t have direct flights as a viable option.