• Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    OK, they go to jail.

    If they hold out, the government really has nothing they can do.

    Solidarity. Solidarity. Solidarity.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      In theory, that’s true. In practice, most people aren’t willing to risk jail time

      Consider what happened with controllers under Reagan. Nearly all went on strike. Of those that went on strike, there were 2 groups: Those that crossed the line and went back to work when ordered, and those that held the line in solidarity

      Those that crossed the line were allowed to keep their jobs. Those that didn’t were immediately fired and barred from ever working for the federal government again. That effectively meant their career was over. They could never work as an air traffic controller again. Jail is an even bigger threat than that

      It’s more or less a literal prisoner dilemma, except we have a historical precedent for it. I think it’s incredibly shitty, but realistically I don’t see it working

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        This isn’t the same situation. ATCs just can’t be replaced this time. Reagan showed why that’s an incredibly bad idea, and the repercussions of doing it again would destroy the civil air transport system.

        So yes, they can arrest them if they like or bar them from becoming ATCs again. The situation remains that air travel won’t exist anymore.