• Sarmyth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s fine, because I’ll be making enough to afford it… as the outlined condition was a factory job that would pay well enough to afford a family home on that income alone.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        EDIT: So apparently everyone here is talking fiction not reality and I’m the only one who missed that. Anything can be a true statement if it’s not based on reality. I’m out.

        ~~I’m blown away by how bad lemmy is in economics. But to be fair, there are no good economics on this planet.

        No, you will be fired from your job because your company becomes uncompetitive in global market and goes under, leading to worse economy.

        There needs to be such a massive cooperation between all countries (including enemies) that this will never work.~~

        • TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’re missing the entire point here you dingus. We’re not talking about reality, were talking about what it would take for factory jobs to be considered success again.

          Obviously it’s not reality. THATS WHAT IM POINTING OUT

          • REDACTED@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            So what is the point of this? Might as well talk about economy in Harry Potter and claim you just figured out how to solve socioeconomical disparity

            • TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              The point is that a billionaire CEO can’t just say “eh, people should be happy working in a factory” when he doesn’t provide the rest of the material reality that went with that when people were happy working in a factory

              • REDACTED@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                You know what - I’m starting to think most people here actually didn’t read the article, but only the title, and that’s where the confusion is originating from.

                • falseWhite@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Unfortunately I did, and it’s full of delusional billionaire propaganda, pushing agendas that will ONLY benefit them in the long run. Make the rich richer at the expense of the poor. Also less educated people are easier to manipulate, a big plus for the fascist regime

                  Or do you really believe that these billionaires care about the poor over their own hordes of wealth?

                  • REDACTED@infosec.pub
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I’m getting paywalled now so can’t quote, but it’s more about states in general. There have been some major developments in manufacturing (especially robotics) that would allow US to jumpstart a new era of manufacturing/re-starting the industry and bring it away from China. By finding success, I believe he didn’t really mean grinding at some low entry job, but literally becoming a successful manufacturer (again?)