for instance by banning early on third party scripts by default, ad-blocking by default, blocking tracking and other cookies by default with much smoother controls
That wasn’t just for Google, why they did not do that. Them having an own browser engine, they need webpage owners to use technologies not just available in IE/Chrome, and ideally test their webpages in Firefox, too.
It was easy for Brave et al to be more aggressive in the past, because webpage owners were buiding+testing for Chrome anyways. But on the flipside, you get all the shortcomings of Chrome’s engine, too.
They should have done it way way way back. before Brave existed, and before surveillance was pervasive. They had a chance when they had gotten a peak in market shares (around 2008-2010?), but their (secret) contract with Google probably prevented them from doing that… Has anyone seen the Mozilla-Google contract?
That wasn’t just for Google, why they did not do that. Them having an own browser engine, they need webpage owners to use technologies not just available in IE/Chrome, and ideally test their webpages in Firefox, too.
It was easy for Brave et al to be more aggressive in the past, because webpage owners were buiding+testing for Chrome anyways. But on the flipside, you get all the shortcomings of Chrome’s engine, too.
They should have done it way way way back. before Brave existed, and before surveillance was pervasive. They had a chance when they had gotten a peak in market shares (around 2008-2010?), but their (secret) contract with Google probably prevented them from doing that… Has anyone seen the Mozilla-Google contract?