If you are interested in privacy you are probably interested in password storage … plus I wanted everyone to know about the inevitable future enshitification of this product. Spread the word and replacement recommendations are welcome too.
If you are interested in privacy you are probably interested in password storage … plus I wanted everyone to know about the inevitable future enshitification of this product. Spread the word and replacement recommendations are welcome too.
Time to recommend alternatives?!
Nothing has beaten KeePass for me so far. It takes a bit of setting up if you want your database to sync among all your devices, but in other aspects it’s perfect for me
EDIT: In case you’re curious, I use KeePassXC on PC, KeePassDX on Android, and Syncthing to sync the database.
Don’t know if it has changed but there was a reason I went to vaultwarden. Syncing was a pain it is probably better now but not looking to go back.
I use both same products, just manually copy to phone periodic as my vault is pretty static
Made the move from bitwarden not that long ago, actually a bit before their price increase (just timing not because of it). Nothing bad about BW to say, it worked great for me for years.
My motivation was wanting my password manager fully offline.
Keepass are fantastic programs, and actually now more pleased with my move after seeing some negative moves from BW I needn’t be concerned with
+1 for Keepass!
Same setup here, can recommend.
Proton Pass is a valid option.
The author wrote a guide to self-hosting VaultWarden
https://blog.ppb1701.com/self-hosting-vaultwarden-taking-back-password-management-part-8-of-building-a-resilient-home-serve
How vulnerable is a VaultWarden setup to splash damage from BitWarden enshittery? I would go absolutely ham on VaultWarden if it’s independant enough from this kind of move.
I’m already hosting VaultWarden locally and would also like to know. It seems like a project that could continue independently but I’d love to hear from someone with more information.
I mean, if you read the OP, it says at the end. The clients are Apache2 and can just be formed if the API starts drifiting.