• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    24 hours ago

    So, another clear sign that these guys started with their beliefs (in this case that vaccines cause autism) and are now desperately scrambling to find evidence to “back it up” because they didn’t have sufficient evidence to begin with. Not that evidence will change their minds regardless.

    Exactly backward from how science works. But in line with religion, so.

    • DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      “We can’t manipulate this data to support our preconceived notions. Clearly the problem is that we don’t have enough data.”

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        And to be fair (which I hate doing with these monsters but which rational thought demands) it’s not unreasonable to start your research by forming a hypothesis before you’ve collected sufficient data to actually back it up. That’s the usual pattern. But that’s the start of research. You shouldn’t be making public policy based on that hypothesis yet.