• ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They don’t address car dependancy

    Some people got convinced that banning thermal personal vehicles was incompatible with the bigger picture goals. You can develop a 15min city and a public transport system while also banning thermal personal vehicles.

    I don’t know what’s driving this misinformation campaign about electric vehicles “polluting more” or “polluting just as much” when it takes 5 minutes of googling to find 6 reputable sources disputing both these claims

    Banning the sale of new thermal cars, motorcycles, vespas does help with climate change in the long run

    Some people have taken it upon themselves to refuse some incremental improvements and it’s only leading to doing nothing

    • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree with you here. This meme says “address” climate change like “EVs aren’t a perfect solution to climate change” as if that’s some big gotcha. They’re a meaningful, incremental improvement away from ICE vehicles.

      Public transit and bikes are better, but electrifying everything is also a good thing.

  • Taringano@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s think then of electric VEHICLES. you know buses, trucks included.

    Being against electric cars, at this moment, is being for combustion cars.

  • rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They are the better alternative compared to combustion considering the carbon dioxide footprint.

    Yet, of course, to really address climate change and the destruction of our planet we need to get away from cars.

        • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          From what I’ve seen: EVs normally produce about half the carbon of regular cars, mostly from making the batteries. Switching fully to EVs would therefore reduce worldwide emissions by about 8%, compared to 16% by just getting rid of cars completely. EVs also don’t fix the societal problems of cars including sprawl and all of its related problems.

          An ideal future would have no internal combustion engines and only EVs. But there would be a lot fewer of them, and preferably in a much smaller form factor.

          As an unrelated side note, when I read ‘ICE’, the first thing that came to mind was the train. I’ve never even been to Germany…