NATO allies are discussing
Which ones?
NATO officials are discussing
Which ones?
What a lousy article, you can’t know if it’s the proposition talked by the important people or some nutjobs from Baltics like usual in case of such idiocy, or maybe it’s just a journo duck.
At least a lot of Swedish parties had an anti-China message for the EU election. Those parties are also very anti-infrastructure, so idunno, maybe?
tfw “rules-based international order” means we’re allowed to break those rules whenever we want but our enemies aren’t allowed to do the same
They were missing some punctuation when the made that statement it should actually read “rules-based? International order!”
China never would have allowed these transfers to begin with. And if they did happen they would have been reversed with no recourse to the foreign investor. China has actually screwed foreign investors in a million different ways without any real response from the west.
Good, we should take notes.
deleted by creator
These dumb fucks are going to kill us all lmao
Removed by mod
NATO, obviously. How is this even a question?
Why would China start a war when not starting wars has been working out for them for so long?
Removed by mod
China doesn’t have a finacial capitalist class that could “lobby” the government to “find new markets” as their banks are nationalized. They also don’t install puppets in foreign governments that shape policy for surplus value extraction or impose capitalism. Please consider reading theory
Removed by mod
Said guy with twitter bot username.
Removed by mod
Niceee, got’m, fucking owned. Still wrong though.
Removed by mod
Wars such as?
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
