Like, the only reason countries exist is because some rich guys decided that they ruled this chunk of land, and everyone else just kinda said “Yeah, whatever, I don’t really give a shit, just let me farm and leave me the fuck alone”.

Then the rich guy on the next bit of land said “I want a bit of what he’s got going on”, and before we knew it, all the bits of land were ruled by people who’s only claim to them was that they were the first to have the idea.

Fast forward a few thousand years, and some of the bits of land are ruled by people who wear gold hats and spout a load of bollocks about divine right, while some of the bits of land are ruled by people who convinced the rest of the people to let them do it, and really, there’s no difference between, like, France and Spain, but some old dudes drew a line and said “Nah, that bit speaks this version of a language, and that bit speaks another version of it”.

You ever think about that?

  • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Territory is a concept that transcends the human species; it’s not all that weird. We simply don’t do it by rubbing our scent glands on stumps and rocks.

    To say that there’s no difference between France and Spain is a bit disingenuous. Outside of colonialism, the lines are less arbitrarily drawn and moreso organically evolved along with language and culture in a context where wide communication is rare. That and fighting for control, of course.

    It sucks that we don’t have universal peace such that borders are unnecessary, but that’s life down to the simplest organism. Governments need borders, and shitty as they are it’s our only path toward societies that are more fair than pure natural competition.

    • Thrashy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not just territory, but social stratification and ingroup-outgroup dynamics are present in nearly every social species of animal. Some are more strict and/or violent about it, but everything from fish to birds to other primate species have social hierarchies, a concept of territory, and a willingness to fight over both. Great apes have been documented conducting violent wars with other troupes over territory and resources.

      I have to say that I’ve always found the argument that “X is an tool of control by the rich!” to be reductive. The implicit (or sometimes explicit) corollary is that “X” is therefore arbitrary, artificial, and bad, whereas I tend to think that usually inverts cause and effect. “X,” whether it’s social hierarchies, the concept of property ownership, or in this case territorial boundaries, are more often than not rooted in some innate social instinct that can often be found not just in people but throughout the animal kingdom. The powers-that-be may well be manipulating those behaviors to their benefit, but that doesn’t mean that the solution is to deny that they are innate and claim that we can make a better society if we could only ignore them hard enough. You have to make changes keeping in mind the limitations of the human mind and behavior if you want to create a viable real-world solution.

      • upstream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not only is it reductive, but it’s also a rather lacking analysis in terms of richness.

        As you say, territorialism and social hierarchies is common.

        Animals don’t value each other on the basis of their bank accounts, and neither did humans.

        Money and wealth are fairly modern concepts. So are nations, but the point I’m trying to make is that we divided land into territories long before wealth had anything to do about it.

        And while having territories definitely cause some issues it also creates a common cause. If it’s your household, your neighborhood, your municipality, your county, your nation, or your continent.

        But as always, the further close to home the more engaged we are. You are more invested in keeping your house clean than the street outside of it.

        Democracy works the same, and it works better on lower levels. On national levels it seems to work less and less.

    • reverendsteveii@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      you’ve explained why borders exist at all, but their current configuration is still arbitrary and mutable and that’s part of the point. we’re watching right now in Ukraine proof that, with sufficient blood and treasure, anyone is capable of looking at the current configuration of borders and saying “nope!”. We watched it happen in 2016 too, when Russia bit off Donetsk and most of the world acted like the new borders were actually the correct borders for all of history and that the theft by violence of huge chunks of land was us just helping transition to the natural state of things. When this war ends and the dust settles between Ukraine and Russia we will treat those borders as though they are ordained by god, too, even though we just watched them change.