narwhal@lemmy.ml to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2年前Mozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposalgithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square214fedilinkarrow-up11.79Karrow-down116cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.mltechnology@beehaw.org
arrow-up11.77Karrow-down1external-linkMozilla opposes Web Integrity API proposalgithub.comnarwhal@lemmy.ml to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2年前message-square214fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.mltechnology@beehaw.org
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up59arrow-down6·2年前It’s not slower, and the rare incompatibilities can be solved by changing the user agent, which shows it’s artificial.
minus-squareThaNookLmao@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2年前try not to ruin the user experience to make more money challenge (impossible)
minus-squareContend6248@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2年前They fight an uphill battle because lazy web devs optimize for Chrome and Firefox is a 2nd class citizen, but they do rock the last couple of years.
minus-squareipkpjersi@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2年前Sometimes changing just the user agent isn’t enough FWIW.
It’s not slower, and the rare incompatibilities can be solved by changing the user agent, which shows it’s artificial.
try not to ruin the user experience to make more money challenge (impossible)
They fight an uphill battle because lazy web devs optimize for Chrome and Firefox is a 2nd class citizen, but they do rock the last couple of years.
Sometimes changing just the user agent isn’t enough FWIW.