I want to preface this that I think public transportation and more dense urban housing is a pro-social idea. I would consider myself to be on the side of urbanism in general.

As I prepare to move from my semi-rural Colorado home to Seattle after finishing my CS degree this fall, I find myself grappling with a big question: in a future where more people live in dense urban housing without cars, will certain hobbies and hands-on endeavors go extinct or at least be relegated to those with the financial means to purchase extra space?

I’ve learned so much from my time in this house doing projects and building things; through it all the garage for me has been a space of infinite possibilities graciously provided by my mentors/hosts (old school engineers).

get a cool old CNC machine and need to move it inside and put it somewhere? -> garage

need 220V power? -> get some from the box in the garage

ill advised experiments with neon sign transformers? -> garage

do experiments which fill said garage with noxious fumes and need to air it out? -> garage

spill acid on the floor and need to dilute with water and not cause water damage? -> garage

need a big indoor place to fly drones? -> garage

build a hovercraft snow removal thing that never worked? -> garage

build a greenhouse and stage it? -> garage

fix an old whitewater raft and take it out rafting? -> garage + truck

covid screw your chemistry lab class? -> garage

It seems to me that the single family house is the boogyman of the urbanism movement and to some extent rightfully so:

  • car dependency bad
  • bad land use efficiency
  • heating and cooling a lone house is inefficient due to surface area exposed to elements

Although I see this, and generally agree with it, I have a fear within me that when I move—and indeed, if other people always lived in dense urban housing without cars—many of my formative experiences that relied on the garage as a space, and a car to pick up heavy items, will be lost to me and never found by others.

The most poignant argument I can think of is that urban areas have maker spaces, but in my experience, they have many rules about taking up space and restrictions on what is allowed and what is not—all very responsible given the shared nature of the space. Lastly, age requirements: in high school, I would have loved to go to a maker space, but it was 18+ due to liability reasons. This led to me setting up a lathe under some stairs at my parents’ house, which was never very easy to use.

In short, I love the idea of walking to the local shop and not having to drive, reducing my environmental footprint, and enjoying more socialization (seriously, we’re lonely out here). But at the same time, I worry that I will lose my autonomy to make things. Many of the condos I’ve looked at don’t have garages, or they only have parking garages that I doubt would welcome industrial equipment setups. You have limited power service and can’t break into the walls to route new cables.

As with any place where people live closely together, more restrictions are placed upon the population. These restrictions are generally shaped to avoid impacting most citizens’ lives and to keep those who don’t know what they’re doing from harming themselves or others. If I burn down my house out here, it’s mostly my problem. If I burn down a condo building, it could be a problem for everyone in it and the surrounding city.

What solutions are there to these problems? (Hey, you European folks!)

Are my fears grander than they need to be, or are these just the costs of the benefits I’ve mentioned?

  • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are maker spaces in some of the larger cities due to this. There is one in Columbus, but it never took off because…most people who live in Columbus have garages.

      • Volkditty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I was a member of one briefly, when I had the need for some woodshop stuff.

        The way they worked was you paid a flat monthly fee to be a member. …think it was around $65/monthly. If you wanted to use the woidshop you had to pay a one-time fee of $250 and either take a basic woodshop class (an afternoon) or talk to the woodshop guy and convince him you knew what you were doing. Then you had woodshop privileges so long as you paid your monthly fee.

        If you wanted to use the metal shop, another $250 to unlock metal shop privileges. Now your $65 a month gets you wood shop and metal shop. And so forth. They had a CNC machine, laser engraving, industrial sewing machines, 3D printers, powder coating…all kinds of stuff. You could also rent a locker or small storage space so you didn’t have to bring all your tools and supplies each time.

        I joined up just for a couple of short term projects that weren’t feasible to do on my own at home. The pricing was a little high for the, “eh, I’ll just pop in to do a little bit.” I think it was geared more towards serious hobbyists who would be there every weekend or people running a small-time Etsy business.

      • doublenut@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I worked with a guy who banned together with a few of his college friends and made a sort of communal maker space. They rented a space, each had their own area and supplied the space with various tools that the others could use. They would occasionally rent out space for someone to come make something using their tools and sometimes experience. This would subsidize the rent for them to have space in which they could do as they please.

        This is a relatively common practice within the art world (they were furniture makers/designers) but I don’t see why this wouldn’t be just as if not more productive with a bunch of engineers. I also have often seen companies grow out of such arrangements. You share a space, start working collaboratively, and before you know it you’ve got a shared product to sell.

        The other added benefit is there’s always someone around to help you unload, setup and be excited about that CNC you found.

  • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    These fears are both true and (kinda) not.

    First, I would preface this by saying that many of those hobbies are functionally things which from the early-20th century / post-WW2 US wealth and population boom:

    • Having a CNC machine at home unrelated to your business? Unlikely. Farmers might have had machines needed for their labors, but dense urban populations were very unlikely to have had any machine at home which did not have either practical utility (i.e., spinning wheel)

    • Some were simply financially out of reach. “Hobbyist drones” and various chemical experiments for fun were far less available to the pre-WW2-era urban population.

    • Some are even directly related to the conceit of living on open, privately-owned land. (No land? No need for each apartment to have motorized snow removal thingies.)

    …now, understand when I’m saying this, I’m 100% with you. I love tinkering. One of my dreams is to set up a small machine shop for running various hobbyist engines.

    So, what can you do?

    Well, there aren’t any easy answers. Trust me, I’ve looked. Local makerspaces are hard to find, and pricey to boot. You can try to limit your housing search to locations which do have a suitable garage, recognizing that this will limit you. You could try and rent a garage or utility space from a local business or something.

    But one thing I would say is that if you’re using your garage for actual hobbyist purposes, then I don’t think you need to feel “car guilt”. Or, at least, I wouldn’t - at that point, you are paying not for a space to house a car (and all the associated issues), but space to house your hobbies.

  • JackLSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hobbies have always been restricted to those who can afford or at least (as is far too often the case) finance them

    Will an urbanist shift make these things less accessible as larger homes are torn down and replaced or drive down prices by hoovering up those currently forced into larger homes than they need? If I knew with impunity, I’d be too busy running my real estate to respond

    • crimsonpoodle@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I can’t imagine this is true right? I mean there are some people like the guy with the Swiss accent that do things albeit most of them are more micro electronics which you might not need a large space for but…

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        All those people are either masters at making use of little space (if you’ve ever seen electroboom’s set in that one LTT video yk tho he ain’t euro) or they’ve got a much bigger space (e.g. house, maybe even detached) than they’re letting on. There’s a good reason lots of tech YTers are from Texas.

        There’s also ofc some folks who just live drowning in garbage from various projects, but you won’t know about them.

        The maker spaces, and more specifically in my xp in London - hackspaces are cramped kindergartens