• CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    I like using both. An average of say 300 miles with a median of 5 miles would show you that there is significant bias toward the lower end.

    I’m not a statistician but that’s my understanding of the two metrics

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah but you can’t really do that with a map. In a table you could. A report would likely report both, but also differentiate groups because you don’t usually want to report skewed data without explaining why.

      • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I bet if go down to county or city level, you‘ll find differently colored areas such as cities relying on old steel, coal, textile economies. At least here in Germany I know areas where many people left their home areas in the 90ies. But that’s probably a geography lesson.

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yup! And if you have the right dashboard you can usually drill down by location down to that level and even include those additional factors as an overlay. I used to do that using census and labor statistics data, and it is indeed very cool.