• surreptitiouswalk@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is this a single box people have to write in, rather than two boxes with “yes” or “no” that the voter has to tick, cross, fill in to select?

    What if people write yes/no in their own language.

    Honestly this set up does seem dumb and leaves so much to for error.

    • Marin_Rider@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      i tend to agree, the instructions are pretty simple, but lets face it some of us have freaking terrible handwriting (and some physically cant due to various disabilities etc). 2 boxes would have been the most foolproof method

  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    An AEC spokesperson said that was because on many forms, a cross represents a check mark, which can indicate yes.

    “It therefore leaves it open to interpretation or challenge by a scrutineer,” the spokesperson said.

    The AEC said the provision had been in place since 1988, throughout federal elections and referendums, and was the accepted legal advice.

    “This is not new,” a spokesperson said.

    “The AEC does not have any discretion to simply ignore savings provisions. They are a long-standing legislative requirement.”

    The spokesperson said in the 1999 referendum, the rate of informal votes was just 0.86 per cent, and of those, many would not have been related to ticks and crosses.

    It expected the “vast, vast majority” of voters would follow the instructions.

    All sounds fairly reasonable to me.

    • unfnknblvbl@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not to mention Dutton voted in favour of the referendum bill that actually spelled this out. Is he saying he doesn’t read the things he votes on?

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Didn’t he also say he’d implement The Voice himself if elected? This whilst actively encouraging and contributing to the fear mongering about it. The guy has no values or moral compass.

  • Whirlybird@aussie.zoneM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the instructions say to write yes or no and you put a tick or a cross, you’re too dumb for your vote to count.

    • Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be honest, I can see where the no campaign is coming from though - seems unfair for ticks to count as a valid vote but crosses to not count.

      Remove them both IMO, but that ship has sailed for this particular referendum.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zoneM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep if you count a tick as yes you need to count a cross as no. Super dodgy from the Yes side to try and get both as a yes.

  • dillekant@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why not have three options:

    • I agree with the voice
    • I don’t agree with not having a non voice
    • I agree (not) with having a voice but not really
  • Designate@lemmy.letthewookiee.win
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you cant read the form that clearly says how to respond to the question, genuinely curious if they have the mental capacity to understand the question being put to them.