Summary

The Trump Store released $50 “Trump 2028” hats Thursday, sparking backlash online as Trump has repeatedly hinted at running for a third term.

“I have had more people ask me to have a third term,” Trump said on March 31, claiming the 2020 election was “totally rigged.”

Steve Bannon said he’s exploring “five or six different alternatives” to enable a third run.

Critics on social media called it “insane” and a sign of “fascist” ambitions. Though barred by the 22nd Amendment, Trump could run again if it were overturned by Congress and the states. However, it would require a two-thirds vote of Congress and three-fourths vote of the states.

  • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The 22nd amendment does not prohibit Trump from serving a third term. It prohibits Trump from being elected a third time. Weak ass document.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Your phrasing could use some help, but you’re correct that there is a flaw in the text of the amendment and the Presidenial Succession rules that may allow for shenanigans.

      But the clear intent is to prevent 3rd terms, and any attempt to circumvent the amendment is definitely dictator shit.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        But the clear intent is to…

        And there’s the rub. You have an extremely weak and vague Constitution that everyone has so far just agreed to follow with a wink wink, nod nod. Once the first demagogue showed up, that shit went out the window.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        What are you talking about? The amendment makes no mention of VP or succession.

        No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

        This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.

        • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The amendment doesn’t have to because VP already has the same requirements as president in the main body of the Constitution.

          Amendments are only the change being made, not reiterating what already existed. VP used to just be the second place in the presidential election.

    • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      No, it definitely does prevent him. You can do not serve UP TO half of someone else’s term BEFORE you serve your own two. It’s a total of 10 years, and you cannot be VP if you’re ineligible for President.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Actually, they’re right. The 22nd amendment prevents someone from being elected into office after serving 2 terms or 2 terms and half of someone else’s.

        It’s technically silent on being elevated to the Presidency by other means than an election after serving 2 terms.

        The real crazy bit is that the Speaker of the House is 3rd in line, and technically doesn’t have to be a member of Congress. So ttechivally the GOP could name Trump Speaker and get rid of POTUS and Veep (through resignation or impeachment/conviction) and have Trump be President again.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Biggest evidence of fascism I see is a constitution which explicitly enshrines the right to enslave people.

        • Libra00@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yep, that’s also pretty fashy, but’s by no means the only fascist issue in this country.