I still always say I was born in the 80s out of habit…
I always say 1900 out of habit… I was at least once rejected as too old :D
I still always say I was born in the 80s out of habit…
I always say 1900 out of habit… I was at least once rejected as too old :D
No rich people, no need to draw a line.
If you want to deny rich people existence, you have to define what rich means, so there is pretty clear need to draw a line.
See, you cant even deliver your stupid thiefy argument correctly.
Thanks for making this so simple!
They didn’t make it simple, they just showed you that you are so simple that you can’t comprehend any kind of at least slightly complex topic.
Don’t worry about it, go back to your young communist lego or something.
I am nowhere near rich.
You have the internet and some kind of computer, which means you are more rich than lot of other people on earth. Does that mean all of them can steal from you, because you are rich? Or are you just a piece of shit trying to justify why it is ok for you to steal, hoping for protection from others at the same time?
Are you getting paid to deepthroat the boot or do you just enjoy it?
I am just teasing idiots for fun. But if you knew someone who would pay for this, don’t hesitate to let me know.
Where do you live and how much money do you have? If you have more than me by any chance, I would like to steal some from you, I hope that ok with you.
Is stealing okey just when you steal from others, or are you also okey with others stealing from you?
The advertisers who spent 10m usd on fake “customers” disagree…
Not what I said or implied, but no, that chance is not basically zero.
branches that don’t have anything to do with guns
Branch that doesn’t involve shooting the attacker.
Keep trying. You will not get there, but at least you tried.
deleted by creator
I think you’re pissed at the objective fact that 12/433 is fucking nothing and your “good guy with a gun” argument
There is nothing in what I said that would imply what side of “good guy with a gun” argument I am on and there is nothing in the data that says anything about whether the 42 people had a gun.
My point is this is terrible and confusing representation of the data, as is often the case in any “data is beautiful” community.
But keep kicking around mad that the version that supports your narrative is not the only possible one :D
Jeez, that’s a lot of words you needed to make a clown out of yourself, just because you are pissed by objective fact.
12 of them is stop by good guy with gun and 42 of them is stop by good guy with massive balls.
No. There is nothing to imply that the 42 people didn’t have a gun, just that they didn’t shoot the attacker. That part seems fishy.
Hitting the record button is quite active though.
Unless the therapists start using actually private ways of communicating like Signal, then stuff like this will keep happening.
That makes it safe from third party middle man attack, not from the therapist.
Also I am reasonably sure you can hide a camera in the room in face to face session.
It was a real “we should encrypt all our drives” moment.
I would say think twice whether you really need it. Encryption is another technological layer that can fail, so it is double edged sword and encrypting something “just to be on the safe side” might not be the best thing to do.
opera and a punk
And which one is the mainstream in this analogy? :)
No, he is being downvoted for pretending that enforcing rules = censorship… Which is common spin attempt of assholes thinking rules don’t apply to them.
Don’t give people your phone number. Afaik signal now works without it.
As a downside, you may find you are not as important for these other people as you think, people are under no obligation to accept you forcing your quirks on them.