Like how bills that goes away our rights tend to have names that sound like they expand them

I just read that the Indian government told it’s citizens to leave Pakistan if they’re there. Isn’t India a close partner to China? Would India see this in a negative light?

Blackrock owns the most shares too 🤡

Youve explained a house flipping syndicate lmao. Dirty anarcho-capitalist leftist /s

Particularly as the systems get more and more sophisticated at hypnotizing

Economic black outs. They can’t ignore money.

This sounds dreamy

It’s a logical conclusion from quack, imo. It’s the second thing that came to my mind after the obvious ‘oh duh cause he’s Russias agent’

Totally. The idea being that you’ll just take whatever bullshit in the meantime because you get to vote for the controlled opposition party every 4 years.

Party of the rich vs party of the wealthy

I keep saying this cause it’s a take a lot of people gloss over. I haven’t dated in a while because I’m too broke to add anything else to my budget, dive bars included. Dating takes time and money, and if I get more of either, I’m using it to better my situation before thinking about dating.

In a time where real wealth is dwindling for most young men, I can imagine I’m not alone on this.

I was going to link you to a wikipedia article titled CIA controversies but took the time to name a few of the more flagrant episodes by them and the FBI which would be more interesting to learn about.

Operation north wood, midnight climax, mk ultra, project mockingbird, cointelpro, operation chaos, the church committee reports.

Reading about just a few of these should start to reveal that skepticism regarding the intent and methodology of the US gov is a valid response and not necessarily in line with ‘conspiracy theory bullshit.’

I see what you mean. I would explain my logic as such:

1. These agencies have a consistent history of misleading populaces at home and abroad, through tactics such as the one mentioned above.

2. Part of their work is to hide/destroy evidence of falsehood.

3. At one of the most turbulent times in decades, the chances of their clandestine participation in the way we view the world is all but assured.

So it’s more of a recognition of a pattern than outright speculation. The alternative view that the US gov is not engaged in these activities domestically seems more far-fetched to me. Not impossible, just out of character.

That’s an assumption you’re making and then simply declaring to be self-evident.

It’s self evident to anyone who reads the things that have been released regarding past events.

The US government has consistently relied on misleading it’s populace as a tactic. If you genuinely don’t believe this and want examples to digest with an open mind, id be glad to throw some out.

Chances that a US 3 letter agency has conducted clandestine operations within the country (aimed at misleading it’s own populace) in the past 5 years are pretty much a certainty.

Speculation is pretty much all one can do for these because the evidence is deliberately and professionally hidden. Such evidence may never be available to the public and usually takes time to surface.

I see it as your typical big investor bait and switch. Start off with promise, and then once you have society hooked and it’s necessary for businesses normal everyday functions, they remove the value by increasing cc fees. It’s already happening.

Maybe one day we’ll get credit cards with screens for ads. Watch an ad to swipe your card today 🙂

I can’t imagine the fucked up shit that would happen if the central bankers ever got their hands on a centralized digital currency. No conspiracy or illuminati shit, just out of general enshitification it would end badly for the workers.

I wonder which US state most closely resembles this. Probably in the NE

Thank you for this

I imagine they don’t want to stick around too long

Working class is working class, red or blue.

Dem leadership is as pro-corporate as the current admin.

Don’t underestimate the effect that propeganda ran by our very own government has on its citizenry.