because it changes every 6 months and everyone get’s a turn

Postgeheimnis does not apply in some circunstances

we use it to classify data that is needed to be sent to one of three endpoints. chatgpt tells our tool where it belongs. there are.probably more practical ways to do this, but the customer wanted AI in his product so here we are 🤷

some do work, but not fullscreen restricted to the passenger side of the screen

awstats parses logfiles to create statistics, which op probably has not due to the page beeing hosted on github

iirc they need to comply with google store policies, but when downloading the apk directly that is not relevant.

it’s been an issue for a long time now and apparently nothing happend since then

even with a dead battery? how? there must be something ‘turned on’ to send bluetooth signals or is this magic?

but they do this here anyway, at least in germany

well if it’s not enabled by default and not used when the user does not want to - it is privacy first, with optional non-privacy. no?

GNU Terry Pratchett

i wonder why this happens. are you from somewhere where this is common or were your transactions shady? i only got my bank block one transaction for me and that was because i didn’t know i had to ‘activate’ the ability to send money to accounts in the eu

this is installed by default in case you want/need to enable it (company phone). it is a system app so it cannot be uninstalled, after disableing it (which probably does not do anything when it was not setup in the first place) you can uninstall the updates (so the ‘old’ version that’s sitting in the system image is still there)

in silence.

use an adblock list and just visit the urls one by one using curl

if you get a letter because you violate the gdpr thing you have to pay. there is no ‘it looks like you do something wrong. stop it or you will be fined’

then again the fine is based on yearly profit, if op is not a company the gdpr should not be a big problem. (but still could be)

that’s not the point. the user is going to open a ticket because something does not work because their browser does not support it. and it’s way easier to tell them to install ‘this browser’ than to install ‘a browser that supports a specific feature’. most of the users don’t even know what a browser is…

i work for some people who don’t host their own gitlab/gitea/whatever and use the paid tier from github or gitlab. they could not use codeberg.

lol. no.

i guess it’s not about the actual site not supporting some browser. it’s usually about not wanting to deal with users that have problems with the page in some obscure browser caused by some random plugin or something but the user blaming it on the service. or because of tracking.