Don’t you understand line must go up, quarterly profits now consequences never .what the fuck is a long-term investment. Get that ideology out of my power plant this instant. /S

It is if your intention is to not introduce carbon into the atmosphere over the 60 year life’s lifespan to 90 year lifespan of the power plant

But he was a data analyst so his knowledge of processes and systems would be basically useless as all he would have known would have been how to access the file stores that were being gathered and provided by other agencies for his agency to review. It’s not like if Russia put him on a rack and tortured him. They’d find much useful information. At worst they would be able to confirm things they already very strongly suspect.

Easy. They got to call him a Russian operative and brush it under the rug. Go ask the average person about snowden

Humans and dinosaurs have a common ancestor, but it’s further up the tree than the dinosaurs. Mammals broke off from the reptile tree so whenever that split happened, that’s who you’re looking for. If you want to follow this train of thought further, we are all from the same primordial soup of bacteria. You me the birds, the bees, the bears, all of it.

Thank you for the details Glad to know that my info wasent flawed, just outdated

I do not follow Australian politics closely but I was under the impression you guys were in the middle of an arms build up because of China doing China things in the South China Sea. From what I can see on a cursory Google, you guys definitely do have strong plans to acquire nuclear-powered subs.

For some reason I thought you guys had just purchased a bunch from France, but I’m guessing that must be someone else in the region.

https://www.navy.gov.au/capabilities/ships-boats-and-submarines/nuclear-powered-submarines#:~:text=Australia’s future conventionally-armed%2C nuclear,that operate nuclear-powered submarines.

Look at my post history. I’m definitely an autistic as fuck human avoiding his desk job, alternating between typing on my phone and using googles shitty auto dictation.

Just my two American cents.

The Australian Royal Navy to my understanding maintains roughly somewhere between 7 and 14 nuclear-powered submarines. Your country has the technology, and the expertise to run nuclear programs but you would need to e to develope implement and import more workers in field .

I am 100% for renewables.

I am 100% against greenwashing gas powered stations with solar panels.

If I was omnipowerful and could dictate what humanity does as a whole for the next few decades to fix our current power problems. I would convert at least 1/3 of the current coal and gas-fired turbines into nuclear-powered turbines. I would continuously and ruthlessly continue to develop solar wind and hydrogen based tech.

Ideally I’d want to cover the base load with nuclear and then use renewables to desalinate and split water into hydrogen during the day and then to burn that hydrogen during the peak load at night.

Fancy that you did the math and downvoted me but you didn’t reply. I’m an asshole but I’m correct and you’re killing the planet.

Correct. ;)

To convert the cost per megawatt hour (MWh) to cost per kilowatt hour (kWh), you can divide the cost per MWh by 1,000. I’m an American. Don’t let me out metric you. And don’t forget to add the extra $0.05 onto the renewable with peakers number because their calculation excludes the carbon capture. It’s almost as if this infographic was made to be purposefully misleading. Pikachu.jpg

Corrected typo from $0.50 to $0.05

Large-Scale nuclear would be $0.16 per hour versus gas with CCS at $0.19 per hour. But they’re claiming that they can do solar for $0.10 per hour and that if they combine solar and gas it’ll be $0.13 per hour

The issue is you can’t just have gas without having CCS. If you’re planning on fixing the environment so the cost for solar plus gas and CCS comes up to roughly $0.18 per hour per kilowatt

This is all based off of the numbers provided in the article

From The Article

have you considered that you might be on the autism spectrum? 50% basing that off your description 50% basing that off your username. Normies hardly read xkcd

If you read your own article, this is a plug for continued development of gas-fired power plants which are better than coal but still are burning fossil fuels and are heavy polluters.

And if you do the math at worst, you’d be paying a few extra cents for nuclear power than for renewables supplemented by gas fired peaker plants. And those are not carbon capture gas fire beaker plants. Those are just straight up gas plants belching sulfur dioxide directly into the atmosphere…

Large-Scale nuclear would be $0.16 per hour versus gas with CCS at $0.19 per hour. But they’re claiming that they can do solar for $0.10 per hour and that if they combine solar and gas it’ll be $0.13 per hour

The issue is you can’t just have gas without having CCS. If you’re planning on fixing the environment so the cost for solar plus gas and CCS comes up to roughly $0.18 per hour per kilowatt

This is all based off of the numbers provided in the article

I hate to break it to you, but the only thing that Reagan and Walker have seen of the last few years is the lid of their coffins

Like this? https://youtu.be/9JRLCBb7qK8?si=sDYZT5z_FlyiMan-

https://youtu.be/9kAEoCHANYY?si=LHq8QiiufT73XKqM

Or my personal favorite

https://youtu.be/KGAAhzreGWw?si=jnhsh4tITA1XR_Qp

https://youtu.be/huumFm2lnxI?si=hUm0iBSD_CepHG8C

It’s simple. You just need 60 tons of lift and thrust. Aerodynamics help but you can make a brick fly.

I think you guys are missing the fact that I’m deliberately sabotaging whoever was the leading science civ and making the other civs crush them from classic age onwards. Whoever became the new science King was soon dethroned.

Pretty hard to win if your three main cities get raised to the ground or absorbed and you get effectively removed from the game.

I was basically balkanizing the map.

Oui