The presentation is different, but the core problem that the FTC is targeting is the same: spending real money to gamble on artificial digital goods.
The presentation is different, but the core problem that the FTC is targeting is the same: spending real money to gamble on artificial digital goods.
It has indeed been pushed and advertised by TikTok. Or at least, within TikTok.
A function call of “MyFunction(parameter: GLFW_TRUE)” is more readable than “MyFunction(parameter: 1)”. Not by much, mind you, but if given the choice between these two, one is clearly better. It requires no assumptions about what the reader may or may not already know about the system.It communicates intent without any ambiguity.
A couple dozen? If you count ones that have never started, anyway.
It’s fraud. They publicly claimed, point-blank, to do a certain thing for years, and were instead doing the opposite, in the interest of making more money. The affiliate link thing is only one of several points that they’re suing over. The far more egregious one is that they don’t actually “scour the internet to find you the best coupons” They will actively hide better coupons that they know about, if marketplaces pay them to, and still tell you in the browser “this is the best coupon.”
A Japanese Manga and Anime from the 90s and 00s. It’s a story about a kid who gets ahold of a notebook capable of anonymously killing people.
You’ll have a tough time fitting the details of each suicide onto one page, for more than a few dozen folks.
Most-importantly, don’t also go kill anyone that says you’re evil, just to stoke your ego.
Here’s to another lousy millenium.
What are you considering as “paint[ing] UI-elements” in this context? I don’t see anything I would describe as “painting” in the code snippets ay those links.
Look into getting SmartTube for the TV. Works pretty great for me
We have this drawer.
A very large portion (maybe not quite a majority) of software developers are not very good at their jobs. Just good enough to get by.
And that is entirely okay! Applies to most jobs, honestly. But there is really NO appropriate way to express that to a coworker.
I’ve seen way too much “just keep trying random things without really knowing what you’re doing, and hope you eventually stumble into something that works” attitude from coworkers.
My obvious pick: “It’s a terrible day for rain.”
My niche pick: Patch Adams. The scene where he considers || jumping off the cliff ||
My IDGAF what you think pick: Avengers Endgame. “Hey, Pep” and “You can rest now.”
“She’s built like a Steakhouse, but handles like a Bistro.”
The two models, […] each offer a minimum of 3TB per disk
Huh? The hell is this supposed to mean? Are they talking about the internal platters?
There’s also “dubyuh” that’s fairly common. Hell, we had a president that pronounced it that way.
Heheh. You just lost $5.
Image is broken?
Collusion among all the big players in an industry, in order to exclude other players from succeeding in that industry is indeed anti-competitive, and potentially illegal. There’s potential merit here in businesses coordinating with each other on who to blacklist withing the industry, which is why lawyers were willing to take on the case.
Ultimately, it’s a question for a judge whether they’re doing this for the purpose of suppressing competition, somehow, or whether they’re doing it for valid business reasons (like, say, avoiding a company with a history of not paying its bills, or avoiding a company with a history of sabotaging business relationships, or avoiding a company that their own customers actively hate, and would lose them business).
Of course, with the courts the way they are these days, I’m not holding my breath for the obviously-sensible ruling.