Damn, looks like my kind of game. Def looking into this later tonight

Thanks for the rec !

A mix between world strategy like europa/total war, management of dynasty/kingdom/territory like crusader king, that can lead into invasion with advantages due to planning/bonuses in an RTS like like rise of nation bonus, extra armies etc , and rts like age of empire/mythology rise of natio , etc. That you can then further go into a single player hack&slash like mount & blade, or an fps like CoD or battlefield, where you are a singular soldier/leader.

And with a significant time progression, such as going from stone age with clubs, to medieval, to modern with guns, to futuristic with space age and all.

And it’d be very cool if you can basically hotswap between those. As in, you can go into the overworld, manage your empire, go back to rts to make units in a settlement getting attacked to defend it, and then realize you are losing on a front somewhere so you go full try hard with solo fps to try to hero your way to victory yourself.

Will real time progression between all the environments ( not at the same scale of speed tho ), so you would be hard pressed to play on every front at once yourself, you gotta make choice on which part you do yourself to ‘guarantee’ a win, and what you hope the ai will do enough to win by itself, or maybe pop over there shorty to give yourself a boost or massacre a bunch of enemies in fps mode to make sure your ai can make work of the rest itself.

Don’t think this will ever see the light of day. Waaaaaaay too big. It’s litterally multiple levels of very different games/genras mashed together, at once, and in parallel

Got it. With context, it makes much more sense.

I myself use some of the most widely used programming language ( php and react mostly ) so yhea, there’s plenty to be found with those

I don’t know you, the language you use, nor the way you use chat gpt, but I’m a bit surprised at what you say. I’ve been using chatgpt on a nearly daily basis for months now and while it’s not perfect, if the task isn’t super complicated and if it’s described well, after a couple of back and forth I usually have what I need. It works, does what is expected, without being an horrendous way to code it.

And gpt4 is even better

I give it the tiniest slimmest of chances to succeed. Below 1%

Too much regressives & right wingers. Entire, countries sometimes.

Plus, a handful of country(USA, China, india) are so overwhelmingly disproportionately polluting compared to the rest of the world ( or will massively increase in the next decades in the case of India ) that if all 3 are not all in into it, nothing anyone else does matters. And I don’t believe any of those 3 will do enough.

So regardless of what the rest of the world does, I do t believe it matters. I still think they should tho, because if all 3 DO in fact make it, if the rest didn’t, it still won’t work either. So, achieving a largely global goal is even impossibl-er in my opinion

We are are fucked as is. A way to ‘solve’ this is a global collapse in population, but that wouldn’t be very nice either.

Exactly why federated social medias instances aren’t necessarily a solution to centralized ones. Meta’s stuff his being preemptively blocked, but it’s bound to happen eventually.

I say it depends on the type of people making the mess. I myself can live with a little mess. If it not catastrophic, I might add to it by not putting some stuff away immediately. But at some point, it’s too much, and I’ll be putting things in order as I go, instead of adding more.

But with a bigger place, I can spread it more, so overall more mess can be made before I stop adding more