Article 5 doesn’t actually oblige NATO members

I do not share your interpretation (although I know that it has been the popular one recently).

I read it like this:

1. The obligation is out of any question: they “will” assist.

2. The goal of all measures is defined: “restore […] peace and security”.

3. The choice of measures isn’t totally free. It must fit to that goal.

So, yes they can decide whether or not no use force, but they cannot follow random political agendas there.

And not fold paper airplanes instead of real ones :)

Greenland is not a nato member

That’s like saying your right arm isn’t a human.

Greenland is simply a part of Denmark, so it is a NATO member.

USA itself would violate it’s own membership. With such an act it became the enemy of the NATO.

Surely we would not have our bodies so full of microplastic if our stomachs could destroy them.

P.S. Volunteers needed for the Mars mission as well.

Are you saying Harley drivers are fair game?

so it won’t show up in the stats

Hopefully they wised up by now and record these stats properly…?

Even when it is just milliseconds before the crash, the computer turns itself off.

Later, Tesla brags that the autopilot was not in use during this ( terribly, overwhelmingly) unfortunate accident.

deleted by creator

Warning: Natural Intelligence detected!

So they actually tested LLMs for being AGIs?

Should have asked me… I would have told them the best ants in the world fail the test for being snails.

Dad, what is a lynx?

The feud between Musk and Apple over satellite service pits the world’s richest man against one of the world’s most-valuable companies.

Now see what happens with too much de-regulation and “freedom”

Muuhahaha…

Asking was unthinkable. At 17 I was glad when they informed me :)

Nice try, Bezos

Mujahideen in Afghanistan or on the front lines of Korea or any of a dozen other proxy wars.

I do not count these as the Cold War.

Proxy wars have their special funding and maybe false motives, but they are hot wars. Real wars.

The Cold War consisted of threats. Piling up weapons, bombs, nukes, and counting and comparing who’s got more of them. These threats were made mainly by politicians. Maybe I was wrong in saying they “fought” it.

For the impatient: it was a story about Merlin. Not a story written by Merlin :)

And an impressive documentation about what historians can do with technology.

Who exactly

Some AI or other, at some 3 letter agency, but they will never tell you exactly.

deleted by creator

This guy here explained it good:

https://feddit.org/post/9039190

https://archive.ph/xjFq9