Death’s End by Liu Cixin
Death’s End by Liu Cixin
I think the benefits of going high speed rail now would outweigh the negatives of upgrading at a later point.
What are some open source projects that I could use instead?
Well said and yea if you find a “unbiased source” for news, you’ve only fallen for their bias.
Be critical even of what interests you, and read things you don’t like as well.
I have a few since I’m a historian:
The revolutions of 1848 Europe, particularly Berlin or Paris. The atmosphere in that year was confusing, conflicting, and explosive. People wanted generally better lives, and put their own on the line to see it happen in numbers that shock us today.
The fall of the T’ang dynasty and the early Song dynasty. I’d love to see if the Naito Hypothesis holds up as a viewer of that time and space.
The Atlantic Revolutions between 1770s to 1800. So American, Haitian, French, etc. The birth of nationhood (in Europe), a new consciousness found its footing, and what it meant to have liberty, to be human, and to be unfree were changing.
And Japan in the 1930’s. How fascism developed in the country. It’s a question that’s big in Japanese history, and not so clear today.
Just want to drop this here because of how ridiculous these entertainment cartels can be:
https://www.pcgamesn.com/eu-commission-piracy-report
Piracy aides in creating sales.
Up to 3% more for movies in theaters: https://hbr.org/2020/10/the-digital-piracy-dilemma
I found my path after university. I worked in the library bc it was a great and easy gig since I liked books, but took a year after to figure out if it was right for me. Now I’m going on to be a librarian!
Almost every comment I’ve seen sees the future as hopeless and I’m going to largely chalk that up to the postmodernism/realism consciousness in our society at this time period.
I think the future will be a utopia, and there isn’t a long term (I mean centuries or millenia long developments) reason to think otherwise. The idea of utopia has pushed civilization to confront power structures and create new ones, to rethink what was impossible, too difficult to accomplish, etc. The many rights, freedoms, and ideas that many around the world take for granted today began as people envisioning a utopia and trying to make it happen. These ideas can’t be done away with as Alexis De Tocqueville saw.
Right now there are problems for sure, and I personally think liberty and egality are only a parody of utopia at this point, but that’ll change over a long time.
Human civilization is only 6000 years old! We’re still working with the brain of primitive humans, and we aren’t even toddlers yet in the grand lifespan of Earth. I think people tend to forget that sometimes.
We’ll get to a better place, and our consciousness is always changing to confront the problems we face today (biosphere collapse, resource hoarding, infighting, etc).
Democracy took centuries to develop coherently, and even then it failed MANY times at first. But look at it now.
Communist, everything else still worships money.
I’m not really sure what you’re trying to say, are the democrats not friendly with ANY big businesses? Is the extreme right wing of US conservatives not motivated by money (Donald Trump is often thought of as a successful venture capitalist, the amount of money funneled out during his presidency, etc…)?
Russia is one of the most inequal countries in the world in terms of wealth distribution, and for decades now oligarchs in Russia have gone hand in hand with the state in eroding any form of democracy and exploiting what freedom those citizens do have.
So, can you really say democracy can exist with money?
Yea it’s totally not that every major news outlet is owned by and serves the interests of the rich.
Redhat: Yes, but also we are liars.
Conservatism Capitalism has always been an ideology that’s opposed to progress, democracy and freedom.
There you go, I fixed that for you.
All political entities serve the needs of capital first and foremost in a capitalist system, people are only a secondary…if that.
At least here there is no algorithm I think?
Should Lemmy have a verified user marker for members who are of importance to any given community?>
No, everyone is equal here and I want to keep it that way. I don’t want this to be twitter.
Are there any other options to protect users against nefarious persons playing impostor?>
You mean besides the one where you just successfully figured out the person was legit through verifying them?
No, it should be up to the community mods to verify someone is legit not the app itself.
This was such an awesome read!! Thank you for your insight into this!
It’s because the moderation policies of those instances are very lenient. Beehaw wanted to curb that sort of crowd from potentially making a mess out of their own.
Although Beehaw is discussing with the other instances about reuniting potentially…
I agree, let’s go full Star Trek and call it the “Federation of United Communities of Earth.”
Ok yea I would watch that too