Nvidia is already profitable and has been for over a decade.
Nvidia is already profitable and has been for over a decade.
But it has seen an impact, it resulted in the JCPOA
You asked for an example of a country changing its attitude, that is what happened in Iran to negotiate the nuclear deal. Now you are moving the goal posts and claiming that it wasn’t sufficiently successful in the long run. That may well be, but it has nothing to do with the presence or absence of sanctions.
I also want to point out that sanctions often work far more subtly than what you imagine. If six months from now, Ukraine and Russia engage in successful peace talks, sanctions will certainly have played a role in shifting Russia’s position closer to that of Ukraine, but on the surface it will be impossible to tell by how much.
Edit my comment to add the Iran example
The goal is to make the cost of waging war increasingly painful to pay. There is no other way to effectively do this than to target the entire country.
Off the top my head, the sanctions on Iran were pretty effective to get them to negotiate the nuclear deal. Until Trump tore that one up, that is.
There is no other way
How much more does it cost to the alternatives?
The courts decide if a party can be banned the government can only initiate the process, also most experts on constitutional law seem to be of the opinion that a ban for the whole party is unlikely and even if it succeeded the would just be a replacement party stepping in to fill the void.
Just try it one more time bro, it will be different this time, bro, I swear price caps will work this time just try it bro
Ahh yes, I misread your comment
That’s not the case, quantum computing can only break specific types of cryptography.
You wouldn’t like it if you owned three houses and have all your savings invested in them
So why are you claiming that when people use elliptic curve cryptography, it has a backdoor? This is not true.
Again with the fearmongering, do you not read your own source? Dual_EC_DRBG hasn’t been used for over a decade now
On April 21, 2014, NIST withdrew Dual_EC_DRBG from its draft guidance on random number generators recommending "current users of Dual_EC_DRBG transition to one of the three remaining approved algorithms as quickly as possible.
Every time you use AES you are using NIST encryption
How is that relevant?
This has been well known for years. Just because it’s news to you doesn’t mean it’s a conspiracy.
The other brokers didn’t need to turn off the buy button because they didn’t extent free credit to anyone with a pulse
That’s a graphic produced for public consumption not the official count of the election.
The argument isn’t that they’re “evil”, it’s that they could be used as tools by strategic rivals.