I would actually recommend Spiral Linux if somebody new wanted to go with Debian. It’s the Debian analog to Endeavor.
I would actually recommend Spiral Linux if somebody new wanted to go with Debian. It’s the Debian analog to Endeavor.
No, I just thought they were vaguely similar enough words to make a dumb internet joke.
Oh, the artificial humanity!
This is a very good point, and it’s one of the reasons I don’t use my old laptop as an always-on server.
I had heard that. Maybe I’ll get my hands on one someday. I hear Commodore makes one.
(I do wonder now if whatever variable is being used to denote time is signed or unsigned, because that would make a big difference, too.)
Doh! You are absolutely right.
deleted by creator
Plasma has a Win 11 menu clone as well, iirc. I forget what it’s called.
It’s already hard to not write buggy code, but I don’t think you will detect them by just reviewing LLM code, because detecting issues during code review is much harder than when you’re writing code.
Definitely. That’s what I was trying to drive at, but you said it well.
Yeah, they are. They’re not the ones getting banned, because they maintain an air of plausible deniability.
Not saying they don’t deserve to be banned, but they’re not overt Russian propaganda—simply the regular, alt-right Conservative kind, and apparently Facebook is totally fine with that.
They’re just better at hiding it.
Oh, so it’s not just me either. It’s one of the reasons I’ll never install Ubuntu.
Are you asking how much I donate per month?
I help pay for my instance to operate, and it’s a cost I’m happy to help shoulder.
Through let’s be frank: movie theaters want you to smell popcorn, so you buy snacks. Smell-o-Vision would have to be more lucrative than a $15 bucket of popcorn.
I appreciate the effort you put into the comment and your kind tone, but I’m not really interested in increasing LLM presence in my life.
I said what I said, and I experienced what I experienced. Providing me an example where it works is in no way a falsification of the core of my original comment: LLMs have no place generating code for secure applications apart from human review, because they don’t have a mechanism to comprehend or proof their own work.
I didn’t say that. However, if delegation is too risky, do the work yourself.
Neuralink test subject: Why do I smell burnt toast?
Who would I jail? The C-officers. Your shit show, your responsibility. If you can’t trust your employees, figure out why or do the work yourself.
I don’t have an interest in the underlying project, but the default setup for Openbox on Archcraft looks really nice.