Please follow our instance’s Code of Conduct and avoid using slurs, repeated breaches will lead to a temporary ban from our instance.
- 1 Post
- 55 Comments
UlrikHD@programming.devMto
Programming@programming.dev•The (successful) end of the kernel Rust experiment
4·2 months agoHi
Can you update the title to be the same as the updated title in the news article?
The (successful) end of the kernel Rust experiment
UlrikHD@programming.devMto
Programming@programming.dev•Where's the Shovelware? Why AI Coding Claims Don't Add UpEnglish
1·6 months agoAppreciate you had the awareness to delete the comment before we got around to the report. It was still a breach of the instance’s Code of Conduct (1.1, 3.2) and repeated breaches may result in a temporary ban.
It’s not helping if some bitch on her menstrual cycle comes and spams her keyboard without any valid points
You’ve already previously been given warning for breaching our Code of Conduct section 3.5 (Hate Speech: Do not make remarks directed at sex, gender…). This is your third strike within 2 months and your account is now at risk of receiving a permanent ban if further breaches are made within 365 days.
Since this is strike 3, your account will be given a 14 days site-wide temporary ban.
- The programming.dev community team
UlrikHD@programming.devMto
Programming@programming.dev•Seeking to make a dynamic website right from the scratch. This is going to be my very first project. How to begin ?
21·9 months agoIf you don’t have anything positive or helpful to say, it would be better to just not reply. If you think the post shouldn’t be posted here, use the report function instead.
UlrikHD@programming.devMto
Programming@programming.dev•The Hippocratic License 3.0: An Ethical License for Open Source.English
51·10 months agoPlease don’t stalk/harass our users, it can and will lead to a site wide ban if reported.
The discussion has gotten completely off-topic. I’ll lock the the thread until the moderators (@anzo@programming.dev @dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev) starts responding to reports.
Please follow our Code of Conduct when interacting with our instance. Hate speech violates section 3.5 and in this instance is severe enough to lead directly to a temporary ban instead of the usual warning. Repeated offences may lead to a permanent ban.
When on programming.dev’s communities, please follow our Code of Conduct. Your comment currently violates section 3.2 and 3.5
UlrikHD@programming.devto
Technology@lemmy.world•Ford Chairman & CEO Jim Farley Wakes After Decade-long Nap, Shocked By China's EVs - CleanTechnicaEnglish
1·1 year agoThis is your second warning to not break our CoC (3.2).
A third warning will result in a temporary ban from programming.dev.
UlrikHD@programming.devto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•To take a step back and see how far we've gone, Discuit, another link aggregator created around one year ago, published their weekly report - 245 weekly active users (detailed report in link)English
363·1 year agoJust a reminder that our instance CoC applies even on communities outside our instance. Please try to avoid calling people slurs per CoC 3.2 and 3.5. Failure to do so may lead to a temporary or permanent ban.
UlrikHD@programming.devMto
Programming@programming.dev•DARPA suggests turning old C code automatically into Rust – using AI, of course
5·2 years agoLooking at your instance handle, I hope/assume that your comment is supposed to be in lighthearted jest. However that would only be an assumption on my part and in general it’s not ok to say someone’s job/work tool is for [remarks directed at sex, gender, ethnicity, orientation, disabilities, etc…] per CoC 3.5.
Please take into consideration that members on this instance may be of different backgrounds than what you’re used to and interpets what you say differently. Further breaches of our Code of Conduct may lead to temporary or permament ban.
UlrikHD@programming.devOPtoLemmy Support@lemmy.ml•[solved] Checking admin status of user via the APIEnglish
3·2 years agoThat should actually work great, in the absence of being part of the API, thanks! Funnily enough the copilot autocomplete suggested that when I was formatting the url param.
UlrikHD@programming.devto
Linux@programming.dev•How System Requests Work and How to Add Your Own SysReqEnglish
5·2 years agoPlease refrain from harassing our users, keep whatever argument you have contained to the thread it started. Following and harassing users across communities/instances is not tolerated.
You will only be given a temporary ban of one week from our instance, but if it continues after that it will changed to a permanent ban.
UlrikHD@programming.devto
Opensource@programming.dev•Futo, Please don't attempt to create your own Open Source Definition · Danb BlogEnglish
2·2 years agoPer our Code of Conduct, please avoid insulting users when commenting on our instance, even if “they started it”.
UlrikHD@programming.devMto
Programming@programming.dev•AllocPPx.pl -> A Perl script that preprocesses C with garbage collection!
5·2 years agoPlease refrain from using slurs and disparage people for no good reason on our instance.
UlrikHD@programming.devMto
Programming@programming.dev•Things You Should Never Do, Part I (2000)English
2·2 years agoPlease refrain from using personal insults in this community. You’re free to express your opinion, but personal insults does nothing but make the community more toxic. c/programming is a gathering ground for both inexperienced and experienced programmers, so this level of lashing out is uncalled for.
UlrikHD@programming.devto
Linux@lemmy.ml•What can you do on Linux that you can't do on Windows?
1·2 years agoYou can, but you may need to edit some registers to avoid windows reseting them.
Might as well start with a solid foundation from the start though. The extra work is minimal so there isn’t much of a time cost to it. I wouldn’t call it overengineering, it’s just a different way to write code, and the way many naturally default to without really thinking about it.

Please have a second read of our Code of Conduct which you agreed to follow when signing up to our instance. Being purposefully hostile is not in line with that agreement.