It’s absolutely bonkers.

There’s so many people here that fight against their own interests by letting perfect be the enemy of good.

Got to love ignorant hot tapes based on article headings.

That’s… Literally just a long password.

I assumed you were talking about a private key as in cryptographic private key, where your data is encrypted on the remote server and your private key is required for it to be decrypted and for you to use it.

If you just talking about something to get into an SSH key then all that is is a longer password.

It should be $0 because this was a credential stuffing attack (Using breached passwords people reused), and affected people who knowingly shared their data with other people.

23&me didn’t leak data, they didn’t have any database breaches, their infrastructure wasn’t compromised due to negligence…etc The majority share of negligence is in the users here.

Yes, they should have MFA, but also no, most sites and services don’t force you to use MFA to begin with, and that’s not a regulatory requirement anyways.

This is, for the most part, the fault of the folks using terrible security practices such as refusing passwords and sharing their data with other users. And this is a shitty precedent to set where the technical reasons for this event are thrown out the window in favor of the politics of it.

That’s literally just a long password that you can never recover your data from when you inevitably lose or forget it (remember we’re talking about the majority of users here who do not use password managers).

Custom launchers have their own issues. I’ve tried them such as Nova launcher and I really just don’t like the experience.

Yeah but this requires you to use an entirely different launcher which has its own caveats…

You can if you are in the EU.

Google just says fuck you to everyone else because they get away with anti-competitive practices.

For a huge number of phones it’s a requirement because Google and Android do not allow you to customize or change this aspect of the device.

Unless you’re in the European Union in which you get the right to.

Fuck Google.

If only we had a choice to… You know… Not use the stupid thing

Unfortunately that right is only reserved for EU Citizens.

Google needs to be broken up.

Imagine this comment existing before woman’s suffrage.

Mass protests are how change has always happened to the oppressed. The oppressed have always continued to be oppressed when they take the stance of your comment.

Yes, literally anyone that wants to sell a product or provide a service relies, to a large degree, on advertising.

It’s been this way for over a century.

You literally can’t.

There’s a ton of stuff you can’t do with the new garbage settings.

Let’s not even mention that on an operating system called “Windows” you can only have one “window” of settings open. And opening new settings will just replace where you just where. Which is extremely rage inducing.

I hope it happens one day, but that’s an almost insurmountable task given the scale.

Take the entirety of the fediverse, and it’s entire history, and you’re probably talking a days worth of search engine indexing compute & storage.

The scale is large and the fediverse is incredibly small. Keeping my fingers crossed, but definitely not holding my breath.

In the meantime, I’ll use Kagi.

No, it sums up a very specific type of AI…

Blanket statement are dumb.

Username checks out

I’m not sure why you’re so dismissive of this? It’s kind of asinine.

Does everyone everywhere only ever use computers in an enclosed room? Is everyone with something value to exfiltrate easily accessible to kidnap and beat with a wrench?

This is valuable for corporate espionage, political purposes, or for nation states. If miniaturized, even easier for targeted attacks where it might be difficult to inject malware, or for broad attacks on office workers.

And the best part is that it doesn’t leave a trace which beating someone with a wrench and malware would do…

Ohhh, you get to pay based on the meters of mouse movement you do. Usage based billing, perfect.

We already do, with intentionally fast breaking switches. They get away with charging $100 for a mouse, and ensuring a $0.30 part will break long before the devices useful lifetime. Generating mountains of ewaste.

Why can’t they get away with the next step, which is charging a subscription fee to use their mice as well?

Which is planned obsolescence anyways.

It’s not a dopey idea, it’s an enshitification one, and one we will see again because there are no consequences.

Logitech will have subscription hardware, guaranteed. They’ll just go back to the drawing board on how to market anti-consumer practices better.

And similarly are antitrust regulations have done nothing to prevent companies like Logitech from just acquiring all of their competitors and then doing this anyways once there is no more competition. And even using potential competitors into bankruptcy before they can actually compete.