It wouldn’t be the first time the USA has employed the “Imma strike you, but if you strike back you’re a peace hating savage” tactic. They’ve done it several times already. For any country that acts diplomatically in good faith, it puts you in quite a tough spot. If you strike back (especially if you strike back harder), then you’re risking escalations, but if you do nothing, then your enemy has gotten a free strike in.
Lots of scientific progress was made before the capitalist mode of production, so “laboring to produce capital” is anachronistic.
The core point you’re making is correct though. Only certain classes of people (rich people and monks) were freed up by the surplus of production of what is required to sustain life.
We cannot know, in the same way we cannot know that it doesn’t contain code that is hand-written on graph paper and scanned in via OCR.
The standards for code submissions for the kernel are extremely high, and their review process very strict and complete. There are no barriers stopping LLM generated code from entering the code base, but the barrier of entry for the code quality itself is so high that you have to submit code at the quality of a seasoned and competent engineer.
Ultimately, does it matter that the code was LLM written if the quality is sufficiently high?
The problem with this approach is twofold.
I think you forgot how many absolutely trash games were being made.
The websites have different (more) safeguards than the APIs do, so bots will operate on different rules.
Wow, I’m surprised you were able to make meat eating even more evil than it already was.
I think you might have a career as an accomplished entymologist ahead of you with so much success finding bugs!
I kinda disagree with the first one. Plenty of places which do not support humans are beautiful. And I don’t like the implication that to be beautiful, you must be hostile with hidden kindness underneath. I don’t know if that’s how Antoine meant it, though.
For prime numbers, since they’re quite difficult to calculate and there’s not that many of them, that’s what’s most common.
Guess what? The guy who picks up boxes ask day for a job will do it better and faster than you. That fits perfectly with your definition of “skill”.
Ah, I misunderstood. I conflated “Americans” (lawmakers) and “Americans” (everyone else).
The laws specified by the EU allow for future technological developments and the advancement of the standard without having to re-write the laws. The law itself includes a mandatory technical review, and allows for new standards to be integrated, and outdated standards to be dropped.
The EU commision did not decide on USB-C in a vacuum. It looked on already existing stanards and talked to many large electronics manufacturers in order to come to a proposal for USB-C as a universal standard. You are right to point out the role that both Intel and Apple played (Along HP, Microsoft and the USB-IF) in the development of the standard, but you’re missing the forest for the trees, since it was the EU making it a *universal * standard within it’s boarders that means we all use the same standard.
The reason we should thank the EU is because of this rule. While I cannot guarantee this rule is responsible, the fact that it’s mandated means it’s significantly more economically viable to use the same connector across all regions (including America), and so this rule is the primary factor in the standardization of charging cables.
I wish we could take cars of the road that way…
It depends on what level of competency you’re expecting. If we count “able to use professionally” I’d say learning a human language take longer/is harder?
To be fair, programming is basically the art of making the computer do as much as possible with as little typing as possible.
I think this is not helpful, since both are “mixing colour”. I think a more apt analogy would be “shining multiple lights” vs “stacking colour filters”.
What if you build it on an asteroid or moon or planet. Uranus is ~-225⁰C, right?