• 2 Posts
  • 54 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle

  • So he’s originally from El Salvador.

    1. He was going to be deported, so he designated El Salvador as the destination.
    2. A judge blocked his deportation to El Salvador.
    3. He was “by mistake” deported to El Salvador.
    4. The courts told the administration to bring him back.
    5. The administration said they couldn’t find him. Repeat 4 and 5 up the court ladder.
    6. The Supreme Court told them to bring him back.
    7. He was “found” and brought back to the US to face charges.
    8. He designated Costa Rica as a country he’d be willing to be deported to, because he couldn’t be deported to El Salvador.
    9. The Head of ICE says they have “decided to disregard” that, and they’ve negotiated to deport him to a completely different continent, because it would be “prejudicial to the United States” to deport him to Costa Rica. There is no indication he has any relation to Liberia.

    ICE claims that preventing deporting him to Liberia is a “direct contradiction to established judicial norms” - as though it’s normal to deport people to entirely different places to where they’re from.

    They’re punishing him because the Supreme Court embarrassed the administration, and now they’re reminding everyone that they were schooled by their own stooges. If they deported him to Costa Rica, the media might not have even picked this back up.



  • Swap the names and this could have been an article from where I am. I’d give examples but it’s a small enough place that I try not to mention it online these days.

    The military action against workers doesn’t surprise me, but the eugenics sex change law thing was a truly bizarre law to begin with - and 2013 is… quite late. I’m guessing the name “Sweden democrats” is deceptive given that vote.

    I’m happy to live here, but we’re not some utopia.

    I hear you, I’m in the same situation. And thanks for the links, I’ve learned a lot more about Sweden than I have in many years!

    I hope we both are fortunate enough to make and experience progress again in our lifetimes.





  • Persona’s exposed code compares your selfie to watchlist photos using facial recognition, screens you against 14 categories of adverse media from mentions of terrorism to espionage, and tags reports with codenames from active intelligence programs consisting of public-private partnerships to combat online child exploitative material, cannabis trafficking, fentanyl trafficking, romance fraud, money laundering, and illegal wildlife trade

    In the 1930’s, IBM subsidiary companies were responsible for the census data and concentration camp cataloguing systems in Nazi Germany (and it’s invaded territories). The numbers tattooed on prisoners were five-digit IBM Hollerith numbers, corresponding to their dedicated punch card. With an estimated 40k+ camps of different types, the machine leases would have been very lucrative for IBM. They won’t say how lucrative, and they made sure they had complex financial setups through “neutral” countries.

    IBM systems also underpinned the concentration “internment” camps in the US holding people of Japanese background. But of course, they’re much louder about their 1930’s history in winning the US Social Security contract - older SSNs were also Hollerith numbers.

    It would be amusing that punch cards were a more secure system if history didn’t look like it was rapidly repeating.






  • Because they’re using them in their products, or the non-public infrastructure that keeps the product running, or their teams are using them internally.

    Check the licenses of the projects you listed. If they allow free commercial use, you can assume those products are key to the software somewhere.

    Don’t underestimate how much of big tech is made of OSS - companies will always take free stuff. They pay them because if the projects die or are compromised, so are their paid products.






  • Because she’s named in very few of the lawsuits as defendant, and all the victim testimony indicates that she primarily groomed them and occasionally participated in the rape? Because she is included in very few of the financial and political conversations in the files? If she played a bigger role, don’t you think she would have featured a little more prominently in both of those categories?

    You don’t need insider knowledge, a solid decade of court transcripts, victim statements, and emails are right there to read.

    Behind every man

    Or perhaps you just prefer thought-terminating cliches.

    Maxwell obviously is entirely complicit in trafficking, abuse and rape. But the eugenics, political manipulation, and money laundering were pretty clearly Epstein’s bag.


  • All of finances, the extent and details of rapes, probably murders, and I assume even more horrors. Maxwell groomed kids for Epstein and occasionally took part in the rape, but for the most part wasn’t in the room, by choice. Maxwell seemed to be far more interested in just living a life of luxury.

    Unfortunately Epstein was the main person who really knew each and every skeleton in all of the closets across the entire global corrupt system. The others who would probably be better informed than Maxwell, like his lawyer and accountant, are very free.