Maëlys

people who work in jobs involvoing such sector should be ashamed

:/

exactly. they also sponsor putin: thanks but no thanks

tbh there is nothing profitable about building solar farms, since its a ‘socialist’ measure and can only be achieved by a goverment. Utility companies like to intervene only when there is profit to be made, mainly by distributing power. Personally i dont think solar is fit above agriculture land but rather on a remote 0 purpose land. For the french case earlier, it would amount to 277000km², which is still miniscule and some fertile land could be sacrificed for such endeavour. And yea, corporates always like gov handouts: like to take everything and prefer to give back the least possible

for a country like France, you would need only 5% of its surface to cover its energy needs (this is at 200w/m²). say the sustainable panels would be half efficient, you would still need only 10%.

also passive carbon sequestration is needed, aka forestation: actively trying to sequestrate carbon is stupid. depopulation is also needed, and GDP’s is to be lowered too

that website is still alive ? how nice

also we need to achieve net positive: pv panel factories need to be fully powered by solar, else a panel would always carry some carbon footprint

the sun is unlimited, at least in your lifetime. also is the cold of the void

Removed by mod