I don’t drink if I’m feeling depressed, because alcohol is a depressant.
Better to exercise if you’re feeling depressed.
I don’t drink if I’m feeling depressed, because alcohol is a depressant.
Better to exercise if you’re feeling depressed.
/s
So west Texas and east Tennessee sound the same?
To go along with this, while you’re still looking for the item, imagine you’ve found it, used it, and don’t need it anymore. Ok, so go put it away. Now look wherever you’re putting away the imaginary one for the real one.
Well, he won’t. Cops answer to billionaires.
You know that if Trump were President, he’d be doing the same thing, and bragging about it.
With how unpopular Israel is with working-class people right now, you’d think someone (more influential than Bernie) would be opposing Israel aid.
If the security of your state relies on gang rape, maybe it’s a shitty state?
Is it a first?
Or is it the first time they got caught?
Meanwhile, we’ve got “stop being antisemitic” trolls casting doubt among the uninformed.
Who cares? Guy’s a loser
8 minute drive is still quite close. I’m 45 min from my first place, much harder to get to.
That’s tragic for those two people… and for the tens of thousands of Palestinians killed…
The real users here are anti-authoritarian. There are quite a few trolls too, though. Gotta block 'em.
Skull and crossbones patch?
Are we sure they’re not just gravy seals who bought some military surplus and decked them out with pirate patches?
Let’s do this after the US election too, with special emphasis on counties controlled by the pound-the-table (or couch) party.
If there’s a person (or bot) that claims to be unbiased but spams every political post with a biased assertion of the OP’s partiality/impartiality with a huge post that is low effort copy+paste/script-generated, the correct response is to ban that person (or bot).
This is nothing new to online communities, but this instance seems to be struggling with this.
Bot: Hmm this article reflects reality, thus it is biased to the left.
Using charged language like that constitutes disinformation and is reprehensible. Imagine if viewers started disregarding a source on account of your bot declaring it biased.
Shameful.
Haven’t spammed lies enough I see?
Maybe you should evolve.
Their implication is wrong but they didn’t explicitly state any falsehoods