I don’t think it has been proven that Loops is viable at scale yet.

“We’ll be able to improve efficiency, reduce duplicative effort and increase profits.”

“And lower rates?”

“What?”

These are the most profitable and successful (and some say innovative) companies ever.

They can figure it out. It’s a will problem.

People have used the word “thread” on Twitter for at least a decade.

🧵(1/12) I’ll explain:

This is the same route they take when saying social media can’t be regulated. Small Businesses.

Be the community you want to lemmy.

Until they turn their gaze to it. I’m sure it’s trivial to block and monitor due to the federated/networked nature.

This is a weird response to the drone hysteria in New Jersey.

That climbing pole is awesome.

I know what biphasic sleep is. But I’m not clear on when you are doing it. Do you get up at like 4 am? For how long?

Or maybe I just need to know when work starts for you?

That’s not how open source is sposto work…

Hypocrisy!

I bet someone in Meta is saying to someone else right now:

“But the pride rainbow covers both of them and more!”

I think both of you are right.

Fair enough.

The algorithm part is a sticky point for me, because it’s always been my contention that you could directly map most of the systemic issues of social media with the rise of engagement algorithms.

In other words, reverse chronological order is the only way to do healthy social media in my opinion. (Or maybe I should say, healthiest). Algorithms introduce too many pernicious incentives. They optimize everything around the worst things.

Most people love algorithms though. And it seems most people don’t want to trade algorithms away. A reason that many fall off mastodon is the lack of an algorithm.

Dude, you’re making it worse.

Does no one around here have a sense of decorum? This is the technology community.

Stop it.

I wouldn’t call reverse chronological order with blocks accounted for an algorithm.

Twitter didn’t always have an algorithm.

Mastodon does not have an algorithm. Or am I not being inclusive enough in my definition?

It sorta partially is. On Apple’s movie store you get the 3D version with the HD/4K version. So if your movies anywhere unlocks the HD/4K it should unlock the 3D too. As long as the publisher has put the 3D version up there. And many did as a result of the Vision Pro.

I have a bunch of 3D movies available on my Vision Pro, and I’ve never specifically bought one in 3D. Many came from digital codes.

Apple has the largest collection of 3D movies right now.

The thing is, new content with proper 3D isn’t being made much these days. I’d estimate Apple has the bulk of what exists available already.

Edit: where am I wrong here?

deleted by creator