Idk, i think it should have reparations, like, if for hundreds of years, robbing, killing, enforcing servitude of tens of millions of people for the enrichment of a few countries should make these countries pay. It gave these countries the backbone to todays “welfare states”, the industrial revolution was kickstarted on the cotton and sugar fields that these enslaved people worked, etc, etc, etc.

I don’t care about the legality, the wording, the whatever, it seems pretty clear to me that this should happen, and them giving this response shows that basically they don’t care and never cared.

This seems a very simplistic way of seeing racism. Like, to me, complex human interactions and systems cannot be simplified in this manner:

Some are expressed as formulas (priviledge+power or prejutice+power) with the key concept being power.

There’s a lot more nuance than this. If you’re thinking about structural racism, the legal, the opportunity given, segregational, educational and societal (even if not official) factors of racism, that’s what I think it is, the amalgamation of various factors into the added institution of racism, as they are at the structural foundation of our modern society, not just a guy being racist, not just priviledge, but the educational access for black people or laws implicitly made to keep latinos out of legality (some examples).

It’s not that simple. Check this and this as they’re a good start.

And, to the question, in the definition I just gave, the question:

To what extent is the standard structural definition of racism structurally racist?

Doesn’t even make sense, as describing the ways racism prevail in society is not racist, because the definition of racism is a lot different than this.

At least an age verification law didn’t turn valid just yesterday for OP.

deleted by creator

Downloaded the book, seems like smoking crack hahaha.

Going to read it later.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

If lz4 was already the king (lzo on btrfs) on performance, this would make it what?

That sweet almost no cpu usage with gbs/s decompression is amazing.

It’s not about buying, it’s about staying in your head, even if you don’t remember it explicitly.

This kinda boring, menial, repetitive propaganda doesn’t try to make you buy something straight away, it’s to make you numb to it, to know it, to receive it without thinking, so then it tries to affect you. It tries to turn nothing into anything resembling truth, it turns advertisement and news, into an endless cycle of boring things that get hammered by the “a lie told 1000 times turns into truth” line.

It doesn’t affect you when you’re watching it, it affects you when you see or do anything relating to it.

When you need to buy new tires, you know what to buy, you don’t buy based on technical sheets, you buy it knowing it, even not explicitly.

(A take from Adorno and Horkheimers “Dialectic of Enlightenment”, the part where they talk about the media, culture, art, etc)

You can follow microblogs on mbin, also following flipboard too.

Edit:

The screenshot.

If I remember correctly, payment data is required to be logged for 10 years.

Edit: This varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but it’s normally 5-10 years.

Monterey theme or Gnome theme forever.

On the vpn/proxy idk, I think the bots would pass through it.

There are some nginx blocklists like the ultimate bad bot blocker, I could share my Cloudflare rules if you want it, as these are rules, it can be abstracted to anywhere.

Estou respondendo assim porque eu não consegui puxar seu comentário aqui pelo Calckey/Sharkey (e também não recebi notificação, vi pelo Lemmy.ml sem conta por ali para responder diretamente). O Calckey deu erro alegando que sua instância retornou um formato de dados “incorreto” (“Response is invalid: It could communicate with this server, but the data obtained was incorrect”).

Pra mim está dando esses problemas tem um tempo, não sei o pq, parece problema com o contexto do json-ld do activitypub, uma hora vou ter que ver isso kkkk.

Ademais, há não muito tempo, houve toda uma migração para TPM 2.0, inclusive por parte da comunidade Linux. O TPM 2.0 talvez seja a forma pela qual todo esse lance de verificação de idade ocorrerá, a nível de hardware. É onde, inclusive, faria mais sentido tecnicamente falando: é um hardware que basicamente dita o que pode ou não na máquina

Ah sim, objetivo é não usar isso e rodar tudo local mesmo. Rodar tudo em no que era servidor chinês e foi dilacerado kkkkk (kit xeon da vida).

Eu falei de meme kkkkkk, mas vou procurar uma distro 100% livre, talvez ir de vez pro GNU Guix, e se der nunca mais interajo com nada proprietário ou de serviços online, hostear minhas coisas em casa mesmo, como esta instância da qual falo.

Vou precisar mostrar minha CNH pro meu próprio servidor? Acho que não, pelo menos não tem como saber, a não ser que a polícia viva dentro da minha casa.

Redhat has a huge consumer, the Brazilian government, a lot of developers are in brazil, etc. Cachyos (the distro I use) seems to not want to do anything, but when the law enters into action, it’s easier to just block all brazilian ips, like my computer updating. As the government can sue and do other things.

Who knows? Probably not even the legislators, but I’m already seeing every judge accepting this as everything that’s on a computer, the smartphones being represented at the app store obligation.

I’m going to install templeos.

I checked again at the law and it seems it says operating systems directly.

The law and a review for the federated world made by another user that I’m not remembering. (It’s in portuguese)

Edit:

CAPÍTULO IV

DOS MECANISMOS DE AFERIÇÃO DE IDADE

Art. 10. Os fornecedores de produtos ou serviços de tecnologia da informação direcionados a crianças e a adolescentes ou de acesso provável por eles deverão adotar mecanismos para proporcionar experiências adequadas à idade, nos termos deste Capítulo, respeitadas a autonomia progressiva e a diversidade de contextos socioeconômicos.

Only products or services that are directed at children or teenagers or with probable access to them should do age verification.

[…]

Art. 12. Os provedores de lojas de aplicações de internet e de sistemas operacionais de terminais deverão:

I – tomar medidas proporcionais, auditáveis e tecnicamente seguras para aferir a idade ou a faixa etária dos usuários, observados os princípios previstos no art. 6º da Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018 (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais);

The App Store providers and terminal operating systems should:

Give proportional, auditable and tecnically secure ways to do age verification.

I saw some obvious bots like a week ago, there are some among us for sure.

Maybe there’s more than usual, because of the Iran related stuff.