• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle






  • I mean it’s a different topic, aside from how a business (for profit or not) takes software (foss or not) and makes money from it. Wikipedia software is used a lot I’m just saying it’s not relevant to what I was talking about. Like if companies didn’t use this free software for internal documenting they would use something else, no biggie. In the same way that if the worlds largest online encyclopedia no longer had Wikipedia software, they would use something else, no biggie. The word wiki is like the word kleenex and that’s great for the founder of wikipedia, maybe? But it’s still just tissue paper.



  • I guess so. I would really love to see the paid competitor that successfully displaces Wikipedia. It would have to be extremely impressive wouldn’t it? Like paradigm shift level impressive. Any startup that currently claims to do it “better” will also need to make it available for free, or instantly fail because of no users ever bothering to sign up.


  • I guess I just don’t get how being open sourced code is really relevant to Wikipedia? The code is not special is it? They don’t need donations to pay for elite programmers, it’s servers and IT people. The code being open source means that someone else can copy their own Wikipedia if they felt like competing and thought for some reason that they could. The fact that Wikipedia Foundation is non-profit basically precludes this but I think you answered my question basically anyway, they don’t rely on only donations.


  • Yeah it works but Wikipedia is constantly threatening to close up because of lack of donations right? That’s a huge fault that persists no matter how well done their fundraising campaign. I wonder are there examples of fundraising where they gather more than enough to foot the bills? Do they expand then like a business would or do they save that excess for next year? I have to assume they’d invest and grow it. Is Wikipedia or lemmy an example of FOSS though? It’s not as simple as open sourced software once you put it on the web and build a business behind it. Maybe the bones of it was FOSS but we’re passed that point now yeah? Obviously I have more questions than answers, just an interested layman. Cheers.



  • Never paranormal. Everything has an explanation sometimes the explanations are beyond our comprehension and I think that’s the tricky little blank spot where people tend to insert whatever the fuck they want in place of the truth. To me being able to admit I will never know certain things is important, I can still keep a open mind while I do that. Basically I’ll believe it when I see it and haven’t heard a believable ghost story in my 40 years. People get scared and they lock that moment into time and refuse to budge on the fact that the reality may not be exactly how they always remembered it, or something.



  • I think it sort of says a lot about the job if it can so easily be replaced. That’s not a dig at the people who do the job, it’s just how we’ve always done it. For as long as we humans have been working we’ve been figuring ways to do less work and it appears we may have played ourselves here. But if you’re writing ads that a AI can spit out are you really living your best life? Is your job really one that encompasses your passion as a writer…? These things don’t matter if you just need a paycheck, I get that but I think you need to be real about what your job is. Like with the introduction of advanced mining tech manual labor in coal mines and steel industry etc. pretty much died off. To me, these type of writers are the coal miners.

    I’m obviously not a writer myself but I always wondered about editors. That must be a job that is more secure because someone definitely has to lay eyes on the AI result before it just goes to print. That decision making person will keep their job. I’m worried people are almost at the point where we wouldn’t even need our ads to be proofread though and we would still get the point and consume the shit out of it either way. Buy I digress.


  • No but I started almost googling questions in a chatGPT format before stopping myself and realizing it’s a chatGPT question. Like for example asking a anthropology question about “what do we know about x species from x period?” I could google it but then do some clicking before I find my answer, or not. But chatGPT can give me something to then go ahead and google for more detail. One day soon google (or the worlds largest search engine) will = an advanced chatGPT. Also chatGPT is too early to be reliable, it’s wrong waaay too much and in the dumbest ways. If you don’t also use google to find sources you can verify stuff with you may end up looking really silly.