

Knights of Malta do have an observer status in the UN, but they’re unrelated to the Republic of Malta, which the post is about.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_Military_Order_of_Malta
Knights of Malta do have an observer status in the UN, but they’re unrelated to the Republic of Malta, which the post is about.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_Military_Order_of_Malta
no, the communist bloc and non-aligned countries recognised palestine in opposition to the western bloc’s support of israel, right when palestine declared its independence in 1988
I think you’re referring to LLMs which are just one tiny facet of what we can do with AI. But there are so many other use cases (disease diagnosis, weather prediction, spam or fraud detection, just to name a few), so we shouldn’t disregard it as a whole. I agree that generative AI is being overhyped these days though and it’s also making me mad that it causes people to think that’s all there is to AI.
probably depends on the type of bread. sliced bread commonly sold in the uk is certainly UPF
His name is Misha! He’s pleased to meet both of your cats
I think mine might be the secret third brother:
mfw I’m a trained warlock:
why can’t we use passkeys instead of passwords though? is it just a matter of convenience? if so, maybe there is a way to determine a passkey from a password?
please correct me if i’m wrong on this. lots of people here saying that it’s not practical because we would have to trust tiny instances that may be malicious. however, what if we make user’s identity provable to anyone, simply by the use of logic? suppose we have a way of generating random proof-theorem pairs (for example, the theorems could be something like “the largest proper factor of n is greater than some m, where m and n are some huuuuuge numbers and n is semiprime”, the proofs could be constructive). we let the identity be the theorem and the password be the proof. hence, anyone is able to verify the indentity by the use of a theorem prover like Agda
a rat tail